From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Traditional Holdings, LLC Corporate & Tax Matters
To: State of Kentucky cc: IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, & Multiple Recipients
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello State of Kentucky,I want you to see Leonard Cohen's testimony over my ownership interest in Traditional Holdings, LLC. I was trying to determine where the mistake in ownership might have been rectified. It is clearly not with the State of Kentucky or IRS. I've attached some documents for you to review. The Annuity Agreement was signed by both Cohen and myself. There was and remains no office in Los Angeles so the Annuity Agreement, which was created before the entity was formed in Kentucky, is wrong on that point. The company was active in 2004 and 2005. As of 2006, I have no idea because I do not understand how LA Superior Court willfully disregarded all corporate books, records, ownership interests, stock units, signed and notarized agreements, and federal tax returns. I want the Court to clarify their order particularly as Cohen appears to be using it to deprive me of IRS required information including form 1099 for the year 2004. Furthermore, Cohen's lawyer filed a K-1 with the State of Kentucky in 2003 using my name and SSN. That relates to an entity I have no interest in - LC Investments, LLC, a Delaware LLC. Cohen's declaration in the LA Superior Court Case (BC338322) takes the position that he owned LCI solely. He also transmitted K-1s for this entity in 2004 and 2005 to the IRS. Those K-1s show $0 income to me. However, Cohen has transmitted a fraudulent ledger to IRS (that in no way resembles a corporate accounting; it is a meaningless expense ledger). Clearly, these issues create problems. Cohen obtained tax refunds from IRS and FTB using the entirely fabricated complaint and some version of the expense ledger. I have no idea which one but have challenged those refunds as fraud since discovering them in April 2012 and December 2013.The annuity obligation would not have arisen until 2011 and, according to my lawyers, Cohen's tax lawyer failed to report the income on the Sony sale in 2001; extinguished my promissory note in 2002 using a different federal tax ID; and extinguished the annuity obligation in 2003. All of this was done without my knowledge, awareness, or understanding and was brought to my attention in the fall of 2004 by my lawyers and accountant. I have emails to Cohen (confirmed by his tax lawyer) that I did not handle IRS, tax matters, corporate matters, loan documents, 1099s, etc. Cohen has also taken the position that I was not entitled to commissions on royalties deposited into his personal account. I have his own emails from 2004 proving otherwise. That's another fraudulent item on the expense ledger. The TH corporate records, and formation documents, were not amended from what I can tell. They control distributions, etc. and I have a management agreement signed by Cohen and myself and Richard Westin's memorandum explaining distributions.I am attaching an Indemnity Agreement I was provided by Leonard Cohen' the limited POA I provided Westin to form the entity itself; and the declaration/case history I filed with my motion to vacate this matter. I was not served and the lies about service continue. That's one issue I will be addressing in my motion and I have provided IRS, FBI, DOJ, & FTB with the declarations I have gathered so far proving perjury over that issue. Gianelli continues to criminally harass me, has now written the State of Kentucky, and this has gone on since he heard from Leonard Cohen's lawyer in May 2009. The DA's investigator felt that he may also have found a sympathetic ear with Phil Spector's prosecutor with respect to me. That's relevant as I filed a Complaint in 2006 with the DA's Major Fraud Unit re. Cohen's theft and fraud; they elected not to prosecute him; and the DA and Spector's prosecutor joined forces with Leonard Cohen in targeting me over emails LAPD's celebrity unit noted in their report were generally requests for tax information. Clearly, the Supremacy Clause would take precedence over a local or state order with respect to IRS required information and forms.I intend to send the State of Kentucky the motions I am filing addressing the perjury and fraud which will attach evidence. There's a reason my name is listed as a member of this entity and I intend to find out why. I have no evidence supporting Cohen's position that I held anything in trust for him. I have the stock units. Cohen's relying on res judicata and laches. I intend to address that in a federal lawsuit. I am also filing federal lawsuits against the City and County of LA and have filed formal claims with both of them. See the last letter i sent them with respect to those claims.I just want the State of Kentucky to be clear that I believe Traditional Holdings, LLC was active in 2004 and 2005. The default judgment and order does not address those two years so I will ask the judge to clarify that situation. Leonard Cohen has borrowed or caused to be expended approximately $6.7 million from Traditional Holdings, LLC and he understood those amounts had to be repaid with interest within three years. This was addressed in the annuity agreement. I personally believe Leonard Cohen has taken the legal position that he is the alter ego who engaged in self-dealing.All the best,Kelley
P.S. State of Kentucky, Leonard Cohen's declaration from 2000 is very enlightening. He demanded these deals, understood the IP royalty stream, was kept informed by his representatives, and understand at that time that I was his personal manager. Cohen's lawyers have referred to this document as hearsay. Jeffrey Korn is now Cohen's lawyer and employs the identical tactics that Gibson Dunn, Kory & Rice, and others have. Once the Court confirms what the judgment means, I will file a federal lawsuit. This Court does not have jurisdiction over me or these entities. No one was present to defend me or the entities themselves. Delaware already has a serious problem with California over certain laws they apply to foreign entities.
ENCLOSURES
"If the company was active, or organized in the years 2005 ..." - From State of Kentucky's letter.PD: Okay. Now, you were aware that 99.5% of that company was owned by Ms. Lynch, correct? Cohen: That was a mistake and it was rectified by the lawyer who drew up the papers. And in arbitration a substantial sum of money was awarded me for his mistake. PD: And that lawyer’s name? Cohen: Richard Westin. PD: And you had arbitration with him? Cohen: That’s correct.