Kelley Lynch Email To IRS, FBI & DOJ Re. Leonard Cohen's Declaration

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: California Central District Court, Case No. 2:05-cv-06047
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, rwest0@gmx.com, "steve@blottermusic.com" <steve@blottermusic.com>, "steve@radicalmusic.com" <steve@radicalmusic.com>

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Please see Leonard Cohen's Declaration filed in the CAK bond deal due to his decision to pursue the 2001 Sony deal.  NO ONE induced this man to do anything.  Why would Traditional Holdings, LLC be responsible for a settlement that Leonard Cohen entered into personally BEFORE TH was formed?  In any event, this

document is not hearsay and I want Jeffrey Korn to review it.  It raises very serious legal issues.  Obviously, a state court default judgment, in a lawsuit where I was not served, does not resolve anything with respect to federal tax matters.  

I have no idea why he testified that I was not his personal manager.  The perjury here is inconceivable.  

I am waiting for Korn to let me know who handles these federal tax and corporate issues.  That would include with respect to IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004.  Neither IRS or I are in receipt of this form.  

All the best,
Kelley

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeffrey,

I am attaching hereto a copy of Leonard Cohen's Declaration in the CAK aborted bond deal.  I had NOTHING to do with his decision to pursue that deal; breach the contract with CAK; or pursue the Sony deal.  LCI was created specifically to pursue the CAK bond deal and NOT to provide me with unfettered control which

I believe is a defense to the allegations re. criminal tax fraud.  It seems bizarre that I would gain unfettered control of a company owned 100% by Leonard Cohen.  This entity was NOT created by Richard Westin.  It was created by Cohen's personal estate planning attorney, Reeve Chudd, who also was NOT under my control.

While Leonard Cohen's declaration, in support of the default judgment, states that Cohen owns 100% of LCI, IRS continues to advise me that they are in receipt of K-1s related to that entity for the years 2004 and 2005 showing $0 income to me.  The State of Kentucky is in receipt of a 2003 for that entity showing $0 income

to me and indicating that I have a 99.5% ownership interest.  Kory testified that I asked that certain K-1s be rescinded and the fraudulent expense ledger corrected.  Which information, transmitted to IRS and others, is correct?  The $0 income from LCI for 2003, 2004, and 2005 or the income listed on the fraud ledger?

Why isn't the income on the TH K-1s for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 (transmitted to IRS) addressed on the ledger?  These questions related to FEDERAL TAX AND CORPORATE MATTERS.  That includes the fact that Leonard Cohen has NOT provided me with IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004; took the

position in the Complaint that I am not entitled to commissions he deposited in his personal account; and, I am in receipt of at least one email from him confirming my commission (as his personal manager) in the year 2004.  That relates to royalties deposited into his personal bank account.  He received and reviewed all

bank statements - including the personal statements sent to his home.

No one - including Neal Greenberg, Richard Westin, the Grubman firm, Greg McBowman, Peter Shukat or his firm, Peter Lopez or his firm, induced Leonard Cohen into doing anything.  This declaration clearly states that Cohen receives what he views as substantial royalties (and the Terms & Conditions document he signed

addresses those royalties); his representatives engaged in discussions concerning the CAK and Sony deals - with his knowledge and authorization; he was kept apprised of the details; he understood the royalty income generated; he signed the documents with CAK; I was his PERSONAL MANAGER; Cohen's decision to

pursue the Sony deal; and it states "I ultimately decided not to proceed with the loan and my representatives so advised plaintiffs."  Cohen also states that discussions re. the Sony buy-out continue.  

For the record, I have no idea who hand wrote the comment "How much did LC pay in settlement."  If you look at the docket in this matter you will see that CAK sued LEONARD COHEN - not Traditional Holdings, LLC.  It is therefore impossible to understand why the Complaint in Case BC338322 advises the Court that TH paid

$200,000 in transaction fees (related to the CAK settlement) or why anyone would take the position that this is a TH corporate expense when it clearly is not.

These are ongoing federal tax and corporate matters.  I would appreciate the request of a response.  Gianelli and Walsh's ongoing criminal harassment, which now includes Gianelli harassing Kevin Huvane and Bryan Lourd (Oliver Stone's agent), will not prevent me from relating with federal and corporate tax matters or pursuing  legal remedies.  I was not served Cohen's summons and complaint and LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction over me.  I agreed to be served NOTHING by Michelle Rice re. email and no email has been authenticated.  My former email accounts and blogs were targeted by, among others,Gianelli, Walsh, and Michelle Blaine.  I have not had access to them for years.  

Kelley Lynch

U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-01068-CBM

UCC Lending Corp., et al v. Cohen Assigned to: Judge Constance Baker Motley Demand: $364,000 Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Date Filed: 02/14/2000 Date Terminated: 01/03/2001 Jury Demand: Defendant Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other Jurisdiction: Diversity

Plaintiff
UCC Lending Corp.	represented by	Michael S. Elkin  Winston & Strawn LLP (NY) 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 (212)-294-6729 Fax: (212)-294-4700 Email: melkin@winston.com LEAD ATTORNEY
Plaintiff
C.A.K. Universal Credit Corporation	represented by	Michael S. Elkin  (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY
V.
Defendant
Leonard Cohen	represented by	Lauren Ann Malanga  Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. (New York) 250 Park Avenue New York, NY 10177 212-351-3729 Fax: 212-661-0989 Email: lmalanga@ebglaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY

Date Filed	#	Docket Text
02/14/2000	1	COMPLAINT filed; Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c); FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 366523. (em) (Entered: 02/16/2000)
02/14/2000		Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox is so Designated. (em) (Entered: 02/16/2000)
02/14/2000	2	RULE 1.9 CERTIFICATE filed by UCC Lending Corp. and C.A.K. Universal Credit. (em) Modified on 02/16/2000 (Entered: 02/16/2000)
04/04/2000	3	ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE as to Leonard Cohen by Lauren Maanga, Esq. on 3/30/00; Answer due on 4/19/00 for Leonard Cohen. (ri) (Entered: 04/05/2000)
04/20/2000	4	ANSWER to Complaint by Leonard Cohen (Attorney Lauren A. Malanga from the Firm: Epstein Becker & Green P.C.) (ls) Modified on 04/21/2000 (Entered: 04/21/2000)
07/28/2000	5	Notice of reassignment to Judge Constance B. Motley . Copy of notice and judge's rules mailed to Attorney(s) of record: Michael S. Elkin . (bm) (Entered: 07/31/2000)
08/10/2000	6	ORDER; the parties in this action are hereby notified that this action has been reassigned from the Hon. Judge Batts to the Hon. Judge Motley. The parties are also hereby notified that a pre-trial conference shall be held on Wednesday, 10/18/00 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26A, U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl St. ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (sac) (Entered: 08/10/2000)
08/23/2000	7	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by UCC Lending Corp., C.A.K. Universal; Show Cause Hearing set for 2:00 9/6/00; for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties and distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee ; ( signed by Judge Richard C. Casey, Part I ); Copies mailed. (pl) (Entered: 08/24/2000)
08/25/2000	8	MEMORANDUM OF LAW by UCC Lending Corp., C.A.K. Universal in support of [7-1] motion for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties and   distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee . (pl) (Entered: 08/28/2000)
09/01/2000	9	REPLY MEMORANDUM of LAW by UCC Lending Corp., C.A.K. Universal in Further Support of [7-1] motion for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties and distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee (djc) (Entered: 09/05/2000)
09/01/2000	10	REPLY Declaration by UCC Lending Corp., C.A.K. Universal in further support of Re: [7-1] motion for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties   and distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee; (djc) (Entered: 09/05/2000)
09/01/2000	11	REPLY Declaration by UCC Lending Corp., C.A.K. Universal in further support of [7-1] motion for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties and distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee (djc) (Entered: 09/05/2000)
09/05/2000	12	ORDER, reset show cause hearing for 2:00 9/7/00, on plntf's order to show cause ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (cd) (Entered: 09/07/2000)
09/07/2000	13	DECLARATION of Peter M. Lopez by Leonard Cohen Re: personal knowledge; docket as per chambers (lf) (Entered: 09/08/2000)
09/07/2000	14	DECLARATION of John J. Rosenberg by Leonard Cohen in support Re: pro hac vice admission (lf) (Entered: 09/08/2000)
10/04/2000	15	ORDER denying [7-1] motion for an order for attachment: (i) all of defendants's rights in certain musical composition, including royalties and distributions, that are or may become the subject of negotiations for the sale of such rights (the "Music Catalogue") and/or (ii) the proceeds of any sale, transfer, or assignment of Dft's Music Catalogue to any purchaser, assignee or transferee ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (cd) (Entered: 10/05/2000)
10/20/2000	16	PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE AND ORDER: all discovery shall be concluded by all parties no later than 12/29/00; each party's pre-trial memorandum and a joint pre-trial order must be submitted by 1/31/01; the next pre-trial conference shall be held in Room 26A on 1/10/01 at 10:00 a.m., at which time all pending motions and all pre-trial discovery matters will be heard; the trial will commence on 2/13/01 at 10:00 a.m., preceding which there will be a final pre-trial conference in Room 26A; the parties are to meet on or before 10/31/00 and exchange all documents, of any description, relevant to this case. Sanctions will be imposed for failure to produce any relevant document; thereafter, on 11/15/00, the parties are to meet and prepare a schedule of all depositions to be taken during the period 11/26/00 to 11/30/00. A copy of the schedule shall be sent to the court. No interrogatories are to be served, except those seeking the location or identity or prosective witnesses or deponents. There will be no extensions of time granted as to this schedule. Sanctions will be imposed for failure to abide by this schedule. ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (sac) (Entered: 10/23/2000)
01/03/2001	17	STIPULATION of dismissal pursuant to the provisions of F.R.C.P. 41 with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs, fees and expenses, the parties waiving all rights of appeal. ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ) (pl) Modified on 01/05/2001 (Entered: 01/04/2001)
01/03/2001		Case closed. (pl) (Entered: 01/04/2001)
01/16/2001	18	ORDER; that the pretrial conference previously scheduled for 1/10/01, at 10:00 a.m. is adjourned sine die . ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (pl) Modified on 01/16/2001 (Entered: 01/16/2001)
03/02/2001	19	STIPULATION of dismissal of the action purs to FRCP 41, with prejudice, each party to bear its or his own costs, fees and expenses, the parties waiving all rights of appeal ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ) (cd) Modified on 03/07/2001 (Entered: 03/06/2001)

---

https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?325996054786824-L_1_0-1

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeffrey,

I am reviewing all the evidence, preparing schedules, and finalizing the motions I intend to file with Judge Hess and the Family Court.  I recently came across the below case online. I would assume, based on Greenberg's lawsuit and Cohen's retaliatory lawsuit, that I was falsely accused herein.  I have only been able to access five documents using Pacer.  I've attached them.  I think when I am falsely accused, I have a constitutional right to confront my accuser.  Therefore, I am asking you to provide me with all documents filed in this matter.

The same is true with respect to the case before Judge Hess.  I was not served the summons & complaint; the proof of service is evidence of fraud; and I still am not in possession of many documents.  In the related case, I do not have many documents - including, but not limited to Steve Lindsey's declaration.  I do have the declaration Lindsey filed in my son's coordinated custody matter advising the court that he phoned the police and further stating that my neighbors did.  That relates to the SWAT incident.  Cohen testified that I wrote that I phoned the police.  That is further evidence of perjury.

Stephen Gianelli and Susanne Walsh are now criminally harassing me over Oliver Stone.  Gianelli has taken it upon himself to write Kevin Huvane and Bryan Lourd.  Leonard Cohen dragged Oliver Stone into this situation when he and Kory went into Lindsey's office and falsely accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone.  The custody matter was coordinated by Lindsey, Cohen, and Kory.  See attached schedule of statements in Neal Greenberg's lawsuit that I agree with.  When I review it, I will sign that document and attach it is a schedule to my motion to refer Cohen for a perjury prosecution.  Judge Hess already raised the issue of perjury.  He seemed to indicate that i laughed about it.  I can assure you that I do not view perjury as a laughable situation.  

I also do not view the matters I have written you re. federal and corporate tax and other matters as laughable.  I have asked if your client has taken the position that corporate tax returns related to numerous entities I have an ownership interest in are fraudulent.  The IRS, FTB, and State of Kentucky view me as a partner on numerous Cohen related entities.  The federal and state tax matters are not before LA Superior Court and the fraud default judgment would not address federal tax matters.  Gianelli and Walsh continue to criminally harass me over those matters.  I still am not in receipt of Cohen's IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004.  The IRS does not have that.  IRS and State of Kentucky have LCI K-1s for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 indicating that I am a partner who received $0 income.  The fraudulent expense ledger indicates that I had income from LCI.  I would like this clarified.  Cohen has taken the legal position that I was not entitled to commissions on royalties deposited into his personal account.  However, I am in possession of at least one email from Cohen proving otherwise.  The IRS is also in receipt of K-1s related to my ownership interest in TH for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 showing income to me for those years.  Kory raised the issue related to TH phantom income shifted to me but not distributed.  These are just some of the federal and corporate tax matters I am attempting to address.  IRS, FTB, and State of Kentucky have all advised me to contact Cohen.  I am asking you who represents him in this matter.  The fraudulent "domestic violence" order has been used in an attempt to prevent me from transmitting and receiving federal tax information and to prevent me from effecting service on the registered agent of a corporation.  Those issues will be litigated in federal court.

Kelley Lynch