From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, senator_mccain@mccain.senate.gov
Hi Stan,
Case Type: Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
I'm not lying. Gianelli continues to criminally harass me. I've been reviewing his emails from 2009 until now. I'm preparing State Bar complaints. LA Superior Court's website confirms that this order was fraudulently registered as a "domestic violence" order. Here's a transcript of the hearing. I asked Enichen to enter the order. I then, after the hearing, read Cohen's declaration (replete with perjured statements) and filed a Motion to Quash. I have no idea why judges condone perjury and fraud. This is now a federal matter and I believe DOJ should investigate this.
Kelley Lynch
Case Number: BQ033717
LEONARD NORMAN COHEN VS KELLEY ANN LYNCH
Filing Date: 05/25/2011LEONARD NORMAN COHEN VS KELLEY ANN LYNCH
Case Type: Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey,The proxy, Stephen Gianelli, continues to criminally harass me over the fraudulent registration of the Boulder, Colorado order "I" requested as a "domestic violence" order in Los Angeles. It was registered as a domestic violence order. BQ, according to the court itself, means the downtown court. The Q itself stands for Family Court domestic violence order.This information was just (1 minute ago) taken from LA Superior Court's website. It notes that this order is a "domestic violence" order.I am asking the Family Court to dismiss the fraudulently registered domestic violence order. I will deal with the "Boulder" order in my federal lawsuit. You took the position that the fraud domestic violence restraining order prevents me from effecting service on the registered agent of a corporation. Cohen's lawyers have advised IRS that the restraining order prevents me from requesting IRS required information (form 1099 for the year 2004), corporate documents, etc. They also took the position that it prohibits Cohen from transmitting IRS required information to me. I don't think a local order can subvert IRS reporting requirements. Furthermore, I have K-1s your client transmitted to IRS showing $0 income for periods income is listed on the fraudulent ledger transmitted to IRS in order to obtain fraudulent refunds that I have now challenged.Stephen Gianelli, who communicated with Cohen's lawyer in 2009 and has harassed me and others since then, has also emailed me that he played an integral role in having me arrested. He has relentlessly targeted my sons and is now copying, once again, my sister and Paulette Brandt in on emails arguing Leonard Cohen's legal matters. My sister's attorney advised him to cease and desist. Paulette Brandt has complained about this matter to LAPD, LAPD's TMU, and others.I have copied Senator McCain's office on this email because the fraud "domestic violence" scam in LA, that involves federal funding and attempts to extort domestic violence fines from people demands an investigation. If you have any questions, hit reply all. I wasn't in a statutory dating relationship with Cohen and sexual harassment and indecent exposure is NOT an intimate "dating relationship." My government will not be assigning me "dating relationships" with a man whose criminal fraud (allegations) I reported to IRS on April 15, 2005.I'm attaching a schedule of the allegations in Neal Greenberg's federal lawsuit against Cohen and Kory that i agree with. That includes witness tampering, witness intimidation, bribery attempts, extortion, legal conspiracy, etc.I should have my motion asking Judge Hess to refer Cohen to the DA for a perjury prosecution and motion to dismiss the fraud restraining order filed next week.Kelley Lynch---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Your serial false claim that the Colorado protection order was registered on May 25, 2011 as a "domestic violence restraining order"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: karen@softwheresolutions.com, PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, blind <distribution@gmail.com>Ms. Lynch,The September 2, 2008 Colorado protection order was NOT registered on May 25, 2011 as a “domestic violence restraining order”, it was registered as an “Out-of-State Restraining Order”.And the order that Anthony S. Jones signed says “The attached out-of-state restraining order is registered and enforceable in California, and can be entered into CLETS, unless it ends or is changed by the court that made it”.Here is the order: http://www.scribd.com/doc/111041974/California- Registration-of-Leonard-Cohen- s-Restraining-Order-Against- Kelley-Lynch-Filed-May-2-2011 Read it yourself. As the order itself says, if you want the Colorado order vacated or terminated, you need to ask the Colorado court that made the order to do that.However, given your recent history of being convicted and jailed for violating the Colorado order, and then being jailed for violating your probation following release from your original jail sentence, I cannot imagine the Colorado court doing that.One thing is certain, the California court doesn’t have that power. (See linked order.)