Leonard Cohen Has Aligned Himself With A Lunatic - Gianelli - Who Has Reprehensibly Slandered The 14th Sharmapa As I Just Advised The Dalai Lama's Representative

Update:  Gianelli's response?  The lunatic emails Lodi Gyari, a representative of the Dalai Lama's, from an email account he created - The 14th Sheepdog.  These are the types of deranged individuals criminally harassing me, members of my family, etc.
 

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: lodigg@savetibet.org, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Hello Lodi Gyari,

I am writing to you as a representative of the Dalai Lama's.  I trust you're well.  Stephen Gianelli (a stranger) has relentlessly targeted me and my family since 2009.  He has written an article that is revolting - slandering the Sharmapa; creating a moniker to demean Sharmapa (the 14th Sheepdog); and wrote that he has a dog that evidently shits or vomits religious pujas on his carpet.  The man is dangerously unstable and appears to be a psychopath.  I personally believe the Dalai Lama himself would find that revolting.  This man has now written me that Sharmapa is a pseudo religious figure who has sold out his spirituality for money and to compete with other factions.  I have recently spoken with Sharmapa and this man is lying to my face about this fact.  Stephen Gianelli does not know me but criminally harasses me and members of my family over Leonard Cohen's tax fraud, his theft from me, and other matters.  I just want you to see the type of pigs I'm dealing with.  My teachers themselves are being slandered over this situation.  Trust me on this one - Leonard Cohen is no Buddhist.  His fan is also targeting my family and is involved with Gianelli, and copies Cohen's lawyers in on this insanity.  I think the Buddhist world should be aware that Leonard Cohen (as his former lawyer and manager has noted in his book) is a hustler, someone who uses religion to con people, a thief, an individual who falsely accuses his advisers of ripping him off to breach contracts, and a liar.

I trust you well.  The ongoing targeting of Sharmapa is unacceptable.  There is a Karmapa Controersy and to say otherwise would be a bold misunderstanding but Sharmapa is a hero. 

All the best,
Kelley

P.S.  I thought you might enjoy this photograph of the Dalai lama and some friends of mine I just had lunch with in the Bay Area. 

STEPHEN GIANELLI'S SLANDEROUS STATEMENTS RE. THE 14TH SHARMAPA:

I am not interest in a fat goofy looking pseudo -religious figure who has obviously sold out his spirituality for money and to compete with other factions whom you pretend to be in conversation with.

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:50 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

I am not interest in a fat goofy looking pseudo -religious figure who has obviously sold out his spirituality for money and to compete with other factions whom you pretend to be in conversation with.

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

---

Shamar Rinpoché speaks about Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoché’s divination - 1973

Shamar Rinpoché speaks about Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoché’s divination - 1973

Trungpa Rinpoché sent me this eight-point prediction letter in 1973...

Trungpa Rinpoché sent me this eight-point prediction letter in 1973. He wrote it in his own hand, as he was young and able at that time. Rinpoché asked his personal deity for a pramana prediction concerning my activity. During the rituals called létsok, or activity practices, a deity is invoked - a yidam or Dharma protector - and highly accomplished practitioners can ask them questions. Their answers appear in a mirror. Trungpa Rinpoché’s deity for this practice was the deity Lhamo Youdrönma, Goddess of the Turquoise Lamp. Rinpoché copied her answers from the mirror and sent them to me via Aché Tséphel, the secretary of the 16th Karmapa. I still have this letter.
- Shamar Rinpoché, June 2010 

Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoché’s original letter

Word by word translation with Tibetan

Concerning Kyabjé Shamar Rinpoché’s life prediction:

Dzaya Ho!

Everlasting, indestructible Vajra Spring: the profound, clear symbolic wording is shown by Youdrönma, Turquoise Lamp, unconstrained and unhurried.

Always keep the life deity of emerald radiance in your innermost heart.

The light of the evil youth’s messenger will be burnt by the fire of the end of time.

Please do the ritual of the Wrathful Guru!

The darkness of the era can be consumed by the fire of the ruby-colored crown.

The ring of five times ten (age) should be inserted into the mantra of indestructible life.

Accomplish Vajrakilaya which overcomes black magic and vigorously purify through the practice of Mamaki!

Beware of those intoxicated and maddened elephants who would stir up internal conflicts.

There is the possibility that the prosperous yellow intellectualists will damage the lineage of true meaning. Therefore, sharpen the speartip of your wise and prudent mind.

Please do a closed three-year, three-fortnight retreat in the very blessed practice place of the holy masters, the vajra rock mountain which glitters like gold.

By the white light of Vajrasattva, you will move to the non-meditation level of Dharmakaya.

In your innermost heart, please develop these points.

Samaya!

At the request of the Bodhi Path administrators and several of his oldest disciples, both Tibetans and non-Tibetans, Shamar Rinpoché has agreed to present this precious prediction letter. He asked me to work on the translation and guided me through the wording. Below are some of the additional explanations he gave for the sake of clarification. The original letter is attached in .pdf format for reference.
- Pamela Gayle White, translator, June 2010

In the first three lines, Lhamo Youdrönma, Goddess of the Turquoise Lamp, says: I will give profound and clear instructions about your present and future activity. Her words indicate that Shamar Rinpoché should do the practice of the emerald-colored deity, Green Tara. Rinpoché explains that this was really quite wonderful, because at the time he was in fact writing a Green Tara practice sadhana which many lamas are now using. Trungpa Rinpoché couldn’t possibly have known this - they had met briefly when Shamarpa was young but had no personal contact at that time of the prediction. In 1973 the rinpochés who lived on different continents had to communicate by sending letters through the post - it seems that even exchanging Happy New Years cards was a challenge.

The next three verses indicate that Shamar Rinpoché, who was 23, was in a phase in his life where he might be distracted by his youthful energy. He explains that he needed the light of a very strong remedy that could outshine the youthful light of romance, as these distractions could potentially disrupt his beneficial activity. The powerful light that could burn through obstacles was Guru Drakpo, the practice of a wrathful aspect of Padmasambhava.

Shamar Rinpoché says that a year or so after receiving this letter, he went to Dharamsala with the 16th Karmapa, as there were official meetings with the Dalaï Lama and the government-in-exile there. He was very ill with food poisoning contracted in the Punjabi city of Ludhiana, so he stayed behind and was sleeping alone in the Dalai Lama’s guest house. Suddenly, there appeared at the door an extremely powerful-looking monk in a yellow cap who seemed intent on harming Rinpoché. Rinpoché thought he must be the deity Shukden; he explains that at the time there was general concern about problems related to certain practices of the Gelug sect. He immediately invoked Guru Padmasambhava. “I tried to imagine myself in his form,” Rinpoché says, “thinking that I needed to develop lovingkindness and compassion as Padmasambhava had in order to get rid of this demon. I concentrated very hard, then looked up and saw that he had disappeared - now I only saw the door shutter. Up until this time, I had not been so aware of Guru Rinpoché - of course, I did not doubt the power of his practice, but it had not been a focus of mine. After that, I did the practice much more seriously.”

The next verse refers to the ruby crown which, according to Tibetan history, refers to the Shamarpas - ‘sha’ means hat or crown; ‘mar’ means red. It states that it would be possible for the Shamarpa to eliminate the darkness of an era, but the time is not indicated. Since the 14th Shamar Rinpoché carries the Shamarpa title, because of his past karma he may be connected to one of the Shamarpas who made such a wish, and great benefit might spontaneously occur through his activity. In the divination, Youdrönma doesn’t say: Shamar Rinpoché should do this; rather, she is saying that beneficial activity may naturally happen based on past wishes.

As for the next verse, Rinpoché believes it refers to being 49 years old - Tibetans consider this to be an age where life-endangering obstacles are more likely to arise than most other years. Because Lhamo Youdrön specifically said that at fifty he should do this specific practice, Shamarpa went with Sangzang Rinpoché by helicopter to the Marathika cave in Nepal where Trulshik Rinpoché was practicing at the time. There they received the Chimé Phagma White Tara long life empowerments from him in very auspicious circumstances, as this was the cave where Guru Rinpoché accomplished his own long life practice.

As for the Vajrakilaya and Mamaki practices she mentioned, Rinpoché explains that he has already done them.

Concerning the verses that begin with the mad elephant, it seems that these directly refer to the ongoing Karma Kagyu controversies. Rinpoché says, “I can now say that I did not follow Youdrönma’s explanations carefully enough. I did not know who to be careful about and many mistakes were made - collaboration and betrayal took place but I did not expect them. I was wary of outsiders, yes, but not of insiders, and the mad, intoxicated elephants turned out to be people I never would have suspected - people from inside our organization who collaborated with outsiders.”

This controversy is well documented in works such as the Karmapa Papers; The Buddha Cries! Karmapa Conundrum by Anil Maheshwari of the Hindustani Times; Buddha’s Not Smiling by Eric Curren; and the Karmapa Prophesies by Sylvia Wong - there is no need to explain these topics again here. The books of Lea Terhune, Mick Brown and Michelle Martin tell the other angle of the story. Rinpoché says that there is no ‘religious’ pressure to take sides; readers are free to inform themselves and make their own conclusions about where the truth lies. 

The rest of the divination verse refers to Shamarpa’s meditation practice. It says that he should do certain practices according to connections from past lives. The end of the divination infers that a very high level of meditation can be achieved in this lifetime.

http://www.shamarpa.org/index.php?id=6&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=45&tx_ttnews[backPid]=5&cHash=901863cf03

Kelley Lynch & Ann Diamond On Leonard Cohen

Kelley Lynch Email to Doron Weinberg - 08-2008 - Leonard Cohen 

(This and Ann Diamond's draft article for Rolling Stone - that Cohen threatened her over - are what actually caused Leonard Cohen's extraordinary flight form Europe into Boulder in yet another attempt to silence Lynch)

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/57416110/Kelley-Lynch-Email-to-Doron-Weinberg-08-2008-Leonard-Cohen

Ann Diamond's Draft Article - July 2008 - Corrected for the IRS by Kelley Lynch

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57415959/Ann-Diamond-Article-Corrected-by-KL-Leonard-Cohen-Criminal-Cover-Up

Ann Diamond Article - Original - Revised (by Ann Diamond 04-04-11)

Draft article for Rolling Stone

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57415885/Ann-Diamond-Article-Original-Revised-04-04-11

 Ann Diamond - Defamatory Publications

Leonard Cohen Threatens Journalist Ann Diamond - Over The Truth

NOTE:  He didn't threaten biographer, Sylvie Simmons, I would imagine.  I have now spoken with an attorney from Harper Collins and have provided him with evidence that Cohen concealed from LA Superior Court.  There is nothing false in this article.  I wonder what Rolling Stone thinks about Cohen threatening a journalist?  It's interesting that Cohen's lawyer wrote Agent Tejeda/IRS that Agent Sopko's March 2008 email to me was a game changer but has the audacity to threaten Ann Diamond and alleged that Cohen's in good standing with the IRS.  Leonard Cohen has gone out of his way to avoid an accounting.  His fraudulent ledger is NOT an accounting.  An accounting takes into consideration corporate ownership interests, assets (including loans and Cohen's totaled millions from TH and I have evidence that Kory wrote and asked if TH would forgive them), equity, and liability.  Leonard Cohen concealed from LA Superior Court the fact that his attorney, Westin, extinguished the private annuity in 2003 and there was no fiduciary obligation.  I had no fiduciary obligation re. BMT.  I owned stock and had no role in the entity.  I had no fiduciary obligation or relationship - whatsoever - with LCI but Cohen and Kory seem to think illegal K-1s are acceptable.  Kory even testified that I wanted them withdrawn.  That's precisely what the IRS felt should have happened.  I spoke to them about this.  Leonard Cohen's conduct is deranged and my Boulder attorney felt that Cohen and Kory were behind the activity with Boulder PD.  He also felt that he was a witness. 

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57416024/Ann-Diamond-Defamatory-Publications 

For The Record

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch v. Leonard Cohen
To: Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>

Walsh,

For the record, you have been relentlessly advised to stop contacting me.  That's what cease and desist means.  I spoke to LAPD's Threat Management Unit about the fact that you - Cohen's fan - wrote me many emails with Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice, copied in.  I sought and received legal advice and that is a third party restraining order violation on her part.  I also brought this to the attention of the City Attorney's office yesterday.  I am now printing out your emails - with Rice copied in - and presenting them to Judge Vanderet and Judge Ricciardulli.  Perhaps they'll find it shocking that Rice thinks it is acceptable to be copied in on emails criminally harassing me.  Gianelli also wrote me that he copied Cohen's lawyers in on emails.  He is criminally harassing me, aligned himself with Cohen in 2009, and is witness tampering with my son Rutger.  The trial transcript (which my lawyers advised me that Kory obtained) is clear - Rutger is a witness.  To SWAT, yes, but that was not the issue here.  He wanted to take the stand about Cohen's lies re. his Whole Foods matter.  His role as a material witness was addressed in my Writ of Habeas Corpus that Judge Ricciardulli approved and filed as an oversized brief.  Do NOT write me again.  I do not want to hear from you.  You are lying.  Leonard Cohen committed tax fraud and I reported that to the IRS in 2005.  His refund did not close the case re. these allegations.  I met with Agent Sopko in 2007 and was then sent an email advising me to report Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS.  Agent Tejeda is also an issue im n Writ as is the fact that I was NOT served the restraining order I asked for in Boulder when it was fraudulently registered as a domestic violence order.  Cohen and I were in no dating or intimate relationship.  He testified correctly on March 23rd.  He was also clear - I have stolen nothing from him.

Leonard Cohen concealed evidence that the IRS is in possession of.  He was the owner of an S corporation when he had abandoned his green card.  That is unlawful activity.  He personally told me he could not return to Canada because Canada Revenue (who I have spoken with - as well as the FTB and Robb Watts/State of Kentucky) asks where you paid your prior year's taxes while IRS does not. 

I was not served the summons and complaint in Cohen's lawsuit.  The proof of service is perjured.  The is extrinsic fraud upon the court.  Cohen has not withdrawn the illegal K-1s I've received and the IRS has now advised me to file fraud form 3949(a) re. Cohen's refund and the illegal K-1s that show I had zero income in 2003, 2004, and 2005 - and completely undermine the fraud ledger.  That is NOT an accounting.  It does not address corporate ownership interests.  There were no trusts re. BMT or TH.  Cohen lied about that.as well as many other things. 

I am advising you to cease and desist.  DO not contact me or my family again.  Do not copy Michelle Rice in on emails to me.  She lied in her February 14, 2011 email to me - copied to the IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, and Ron Burkle who I can assure you doesn't want to hear from her, you, or Gianelli.  In fact, no one in my world wants to hear from or about any of you - including Cohen.  The man is pathetic and people understand this - he LIES under oath.  That would include with respect to Phil Spector whose master tapes he sold to Sony.  Leonard Cohen is out of control and no one assailed his reputation re. drugs.  He has a long and publicly documented history of drug abuse.  That's his problem.  He testified that the Aryan Nation matter is an implied threat to him.  It is a Dallas FBI investigation involving a murder, meth labs, meth cooks, the Cartel, and the Aryan Nation. 

He and his lawyer, Kory, went into Lindsey's office and accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone.  That's a bald faced lie and Oliver Stone will receive a subpoena and I am moving legally against Cohen regardless of the criminal harassment (some of which - Gianelli - has been brought to the atteniton of the court in my Writ)

Leonard Cohen has targeted both of my sons and wrote me that he sees Rutger copied in - in 2011, violating the restraining order.  The subject line reads 2004/2005 taxes so I know why he was focused on Rutger.  So are you and Gianelli. 

CEASE AND DESIST.   My appellate attorney doesn't want to hear from you and Gianelli either.  He views it as criminal harassment and thinks there is indeed witness tampering going on.

Kelley Lynch

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Gianelli Writes Me About Writness Tampering & Steven Machat - Who Has Accused Leonard Cohen Of Theft, Evading Taxes Uses Corporations, And Called Him A Hustler & Fraud In His Book

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

Gianelli,

I've addressed your witness tampering with my son, Rutger.  He is a material witness.  The judge at my Stalinesque Show Trial (featuring testimony about Phil Spector, a gun, DA Steve Cooley, and Alan Jackson - as well as the IRS which the judge had no jurisdiction to hear) was well aware of this and didn't permit him to testify.  Therefore, and you are a lawyer so stop lying to me about this, the issue re. Rutger (and Agent Tejeda/IRS) as a material witness has been addressed in my Writ.  That writ was accepted and filed as an oversized brief by Judge Ricciardelli on May 3, 2013.  If you want to lie about Judge Ricciardelli's order, contact him directly and tell him the order I am looking at is a bald-faced liar, that you are an individual addressed in that Writ, and that I believe you engage in criminal witness tampering, harassment, etc.  That is my personal opinion and it appears obvious. 

There's nothing vague about advising you to CEASE AND DESIST which my sister's lawyer, when he spoke to you, advised you as well - with respect to her.  You publicly lied about my sister (who you do not know but you appear to think you do) - on Cohen's behalf - when you falsely accused her of starting her and her husband's business with Cohen's cash.  That's a bald-faced lie and you then attempted to blackmail her with this information.  You don't know my sister or my former roommate and have no idea what you are talking about.

Rutger would never give you an assessment of me.  Make no mistake about that - regardless of what you believe.  Ray Lawrence has never seen me drunk.  Ever.  I haven't seen him since February but I have had other roommates who are well aware of the fact that I am not crazy, a drunk, or out of control.  Steven Machat lied that Leonard Cohen and I entered into a palimony settlement.  Ask Cohen.  He'll tell you it's a bald-faced lie.  He also implied that Cohen stole bearer bonds,  has stated publicly that Cohen stole from him; uses corporation's to evade taxes; has US tax problems due to his green card; and is a hustler who uses religion as a fraudulent cover. 

I agree with Pavelic's position on the DA's office.  He wrote me that Phil Spector should never have been charged.  I have emails from Bill Pavelic and don't need a liar like yourself telling me what he did or didn't say. 

I have been clear with you about Cutler:  MARRY THE MAN.  He worked for Phil Spector.  I brought the activity with respect to Phil Spector, Cohen's various versions of his gun story re. Phillip (three are now before LA Superior Court), Cooley, Dixon, etc. to his attention.  The Grand Jury Legal Adviser then advised me to bring Cohen's three versions of his gun story (since Mick Brown/UK Telegraph confirmed in writing that he reviewed the Grand Jury Transcripts and Cohen's statements were presented to the Grand Jurors in the Phil Spector matter and most certainly appear in at least two prosecutorial motions readily available at LA Superior Court) to the attention of Phillip's appellate attorney.  If Bruce Cutler betrayed Phil Spector that is his problem.  I wrote Phillip about Cutler's conduct and heard back from him immediately thereafter. 

CEASE AND DESIST.  Those are not vague terms.  Stop criminally harassing my family.  Stop witness tampering with Rutger.

Kelley Lynch

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:02 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

What do you mean you have "addressed" my "witness tampering" with Rutger?

I think the terms cease and desist are exceedingly clear - as are witness tampering.  Even a lying lawyer with motive who has relentlessly targeted me, members of my family, and others, should understand these simple legal terms.  

You are always quite vague.

If you are implying some kind of mutual exchange Rutger (as you are fond of putting it) has always been quite clear: you are not well enough to address legal issues right now; the issues with Karen were caused by things you stirred up; you need to stop emailing public officials and you need psychiatric treatment.

This lunatic does not know Rutger and Rutger has never said that I am not well enough to address legal issues.  In fact, an upcoming motion will prove otherwise.  See future exhibits.  Gianelli doesn't know my sister.  We never discussed public officials and she knows I have no psychiatric problems.  Her lawyer advised Gianelli to cease and desist.  This man is dangerously unstable and his obsession with my family members is sick, vile, vulgar, obsessive, and shocking. 

I agree wholeheartedly with Rutger's assessment of you.

Rutger hasn't given anyone an assessment of me.  He's not stupid and knows that Gianelli has targeted me relentlessly since 2009. Gianelli has also targeted Rutger over his Whole Foods matter - as have Cohen and prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter.

I also agree with Ray Lawrence's description of "drunk, crazy and out of control" and Steven Machat's statement that "Kelley Lynch is at best a pathological liar".

I haven't seen my former roommate since February and have no idea what he is talking about.  Steven Machat has lied about me.  In his book, he wrote that Leonard Cohen and I entered into a palimony agreement which is - to borrow Machat's prhase - bullshit.  I haven't lied and have been clear with Machat - leave me out of the Machat & Machat theft issue with Leonard Cohen.  Machat is a lawyer, asked me to provide him with evidence (which I did), and advised me that he intended to sue Cohen and Kory who he referred to as evil.  He is correct in that assessment.

I agree with Pavelic's 2009 email that you are "obviously a disturbed woman" and Bruce Cutler's description of you as a "stalker".

I have received a number of private emails from Bill Pavelic who advised me that charges should never have been filed against Phil Spector.  He seems to have a keen understanding of the incestuous relationship between the DA's office, City Attorney's office, and certain elements of law enforcement and LA Superior Court.  There is a reason that people understand that LA is corrupt.  That is a well known fact. As for Bruce Cutler - if he betrayed Phil Spector, that is his problem.  Judge Larry Fidler's clerk, Wendy, after hearing the situation (re. Cohen's three versions of his Phil Spector gun story - including one used in motions to Judge Fidler) advised me to write the DA and copy Judge Fidler in if I felt more comfortable, as I advised her that the DA's office had threatened me, retaliated against me, etc.  I decided to address this situation in my Writ of Habeas Corpus as prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter decided to conceal the email Cohen sent her with a version of the Phil Spector gun story that impeached his testimony on the stand and proves that - time and time again - Cohen will lie under oath.  He also testified at the March 23, 2012 hearing that I stole nothing from him but his "peace of mind." Bruce Cutler is Phil Spector's problem - not mine. 
 

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

---

LA Confidential Meets Leonard Cohen - Stephen Gianelli Has Once Again Been Advised To Cease & Desist & To Stop Witness Tampering

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

Hi FBI,

That is so creepy but sounds like LA Confidential from my perspective.  Gianelli's a staunch supporter of Alan Jackson, Pat Dion, and Steve Cooley, so he must not like what Bill Pavelic wrote about the Phil Spector matter.  And they're all incestuously connected in LA - certain elements of law enforcement, the DA's office, and the City Attorney's office.  Well, Trutanich lost the election so hopefully the next CA won't be so impressed with celebrity frauds.  And they're all connected to the jurists.  As I said - it looks like a criminal enterprise.  Pavelic, who doesn't interest me in the least (although I've received numerous private emails from him that I've copied to Phil Spector's attorneys and others) seems to think that this is also an incestuous criminal enterprise.

I have repeatedly addressed Gianelli's witness tampering - with Rutger.  Now, regardless of this lunatic's lies, the FBI has my Writ of Habeas Corpus and Rutger is addressed in that Writ as a material witness (as is Agent Tejeda/IRS) and was raised on the record in my trial.  I did not agree to let my PDs question Rutger over SWAT and it was never discussed - with me or Rutger.  Rutger wanted to take the stand re. Cohen's testimony over his Whole Foods matter.  And now, Gianelli and Cohen's fan are criminally harassing him and me over this issue.  As we know, Walsh communicates with Cohen's legal team and copies Michelle Rice in, violating the restraining order as I discussed with LAPD's TMU and raised as an issue with the City Attorney yesterday when I called to advise them to cease and desist their activity re. Gianelli who wrote that they asked him for my address, etc.  Streeter was probably in touch with Gianelli - hence the NAMBLA email that didn't relate to Cohen. I wonder why that was material in any way, shape, or form?  Oh right - because she and Cohen lie and this is how she plays her rotten, dirty game. 

Trust me - I am sitting here with an order from Judge Ricciardulli with respect to his acceptance and filing of my over-sized brief.  I'm not interested in a lying lawyer with motive's comments on the matter.

I want to reiterate my concern that this dangerously unstable lunatic, ,Gianelli, continues to target Rutger.  Let me know if you would like my thoughts on the federal violations here - that relate to my reporting Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud, his theft from me, etc.  The IRS is in receipt of the evidence proving Cohen's fraud, perjury, and concealment and so perhaps Cohen's past drug abuse and borderline personality disorder have overcome his ability to act like a human being, tell the truth, or advise his lawyers not to permit them to be engaged in activity that involves the ongoing targeting of me - by people like Walsh and Gianelli.  Leonard Cohen said I assailed his reputation but he has a long history of drug abuse.  He should have been drug tested.

All the best,
Kelley 

THE HUNT FOR DR. HENRY LEE - DR. MICHAEL BADEN AND BILL PAVELIC

"....After years of grabbing negative headlines for losing the O. J. Simpson double homicide case and other celebrity trials, involving the same three participants, it was inevitable and predictable that the Los Angeles criminal injustice system via Robbery Homicide Division would administer their personal vendettas against me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden. That moment arrived in 2007 when music mogul Phil Spector was charged with the murder of Lana Clarkson. Revenge by the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division and the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office against three former members of the O. J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would be a "MF"and "MF" didn't stand for Mark Fuhrman...."

"....Exposing the truth is never in the interest of those who suppress it and eliminating three members of the O.J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would have to be executed with precision by the Los Angeles Police Robbery Homicide Division and their protectorate, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office...."

"....The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office and the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division in the Phil Spector's (2007) murder trial embarked on a mission to intentionally frame me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden, in a manufactured and bogus "obstruction of justice" crime. The architects of this conspiracy involved Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Robbery Homicide Detective Victor Pietrantoni...."

".... Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon, persuaded the judge to creatively, albeit injudiciously, grant the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division authority to "investigate" the circumstances of the missing evidence and assigned this case to Robbery Homicide Division (RHD) investigator Victor Pietrantoni, a friend of Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Anthony Pellicano...."

"....What a "happy coincidence" that this case would end up in the lap of Detective Victor Pietrantoni a Robbery Homicide STUD who was nicknamed "Casanova" because of his steamy relationship with a high ranking Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney. Detective Victor Pietrantoni is just one of many LAPD officers who are incestuously connected and or married to members of the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, The City Attorney's Office and or to the jurists assigned to the Los Angeles and Orange County Superior Courts. Consequently, allowing Victor Pietrantoni to conduct an impartial obstruction of justice investigation was tantamount to allowing the fox to investigate who broke into the hen house...."

"....Instead of convening the Grand Jury to investigate the false allegations manufactured by the District Attorney prosecutors, which were revolting, contemptible and based on perjurious witnesses, the Judge relied on a page from the "Spanish Inquisition" and used his black robe, minus the hood, to lunch a personal, vicious, unethical, and unrelenting televised smear campaign against Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, and Investigative Consultant Bill Pavelic. The judicial objective (payback) had one purpose in mind; to publicly humiliate and destroy the professional reputation of the "Dream Team" participants....knowing it could be accomplished with impunity while hiding behind judicial immunity...."

"....It should come as no shock to anyone in Los Angeles, especially the judiciary, that dishonesty was compulsory in much of Robbery Homicide Division (under Chief Daryl Gates) and that my old colleagues at the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office have shown an affinity of using the grotesque Robbery Homicide Division to dispense their own form of perverted justice through patently rigged and self serving investigations...."

http://www.guiltyofincompetence.com/lapd-hunt-for-dr-henry-lee-dr-michael-baden-b-pavelic-t99.html

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Mr. Riordan,

I do now wonder about Gianelli's connection to Pat Dixon.  Wow - withholding evidence and concealing their dealings with Pellicano.  Sounds like LA Confidential. Gianelli appears to be on someone's payroll. 

Love,
Kelley

During the trial, Jones’ defense team repeatedly accused Kerlin, Deputy D.A. Patrick Dixon, and Robbery-Homicide Detectives Marcia and Gizzi of withholding evidence and concealing their dealings with Pellicano.

http://www.laweekly.com/2003-12-18/news/p-i-for-all/full/

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

CEASE AND DESIST Gianelli.  I see you're just another rotten, shabby, lying lawyer whose into false accusations, etc.  I have been clear - the Writ was filed and the over-sized brief approved by the judge on May 3rd.  Rutger is addressed as a material witness in that matter.

NOW STOP CONTACTING ME.  Call Pellicano or Dixon.  They might be able to find you another job criminally harassing people and witness tampering.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

Did you submit an application to file an over sized brief? Did you receive a written order it was granted?

Your name and address is on the writ - not Francisco's.

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

---

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:09:51 -0700

To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI<stephengianelli@gmail.com>; *irs. commissioner<*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>; Washington Field<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; ASKDOJ<ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>; Kelly.Sopko<Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>; Doug.Davis<Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>; Dennis<Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI

To the IRS,

My taxes are paid and none are due and owing.  Gianelli has, however, transmitted fraud to the IRS.  Since he lies so frequently to the IRS, ,I would assume he has lied on all of his tax returns as well.

He has been advised to cease and desist.  And yes, he is witness tampering with Rutger who was raised as a witness in my alleged trial and is addressed as a material witness in the writ that was filed and accepted by Judge Ricciardulli - who approved the oversized brief as well.

Kelley

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:00 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:

“What's Gianelli interest in my tax returns?”

I pay my taxes, and you don’t. That’s my interest, I am supporting deadbeats like you.

Stephen Gianelli is a bald-faced liar with motive aligned with Leonard Cohen.  This man is lying about my taxes.  They are paid in full and I owe no taxes.  Gianelli has no access to my tax returns and, as a lawyer, understands that the IRS does not reveal private tax information to anyone but the taxpayer.  That's why I only discovered Leonard Cohen's fraudulent IRS refund during my trial, on April 9, 2012 when the prosecutor blind-sided my lawyers with an IRS binder containing evidence of this fraud.  The judge then lied and said I was aware of these matters.  That is simply outrageous.  He deprived me of a defense and material witnesses - Rutger Penick and Agent Tejeda/IRS.  Very convenient for LA County, I might note.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47 PM
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI; Washington Field; *irs. commissioner; ASKDOJ; Kelly.Sopko; Dennis; Francisco.A.Suarez

Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI

To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

What's Gianelli's interest in my tax returns?  I don't have a 1099 from Cohen for the year 2004.  Also, the illegal K-1s totally undermine the fraudulent expense ledger.  Cohen transmitted them (on behalf of LCI) to the IRS.  They show $0 income for 2004 and 2005.  The LCI K-1s transmitted to the State of Kentucky re. me and Cohen (prepared by his lawyer and filed with the return by his lawyer) in 2003 also show $0 income from LCI and name me as a 99.5% partner on LCI.  I have received K-1s from TH and paid taxes on that income - including substantial cap gain partnership income in 2003 that is not addressed on the fraud expense ledgers. I can assure you that I did not make charitable contributions to the iRS and FTB on behalf of Leonard Cohen over this matter. 

Gianelli has transmitted the fraudulent ledger and a fraudulent form 3949(a) to the iRS about me.  He should be arrested over that alone  The IRS personally advised me to file fraud form 3949(a) respect to Leonard Cohen's fraudulent refund (confirmed/received in 2005) that pre-dates the fraudulent default judgment in 2006 and my meeting with Agent Sopko in 2007 and her subsequent email to me to report Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS in 2007.  Streeter was in possession of the IRS binder an concealed that evidence from the jurors.  What is the first question an investigator asked me the other night?  Do I have confirmation from the IRS or Treasury that I reported Cohen's tax fraud?  The answer is yes and that is the only document addressing Leonard Cohen's tax fraud from the IRS or Treasury.  The prosecutor,  however, attempted to advise jurors that I was being audited or investigated by the iRS and that's a bald-faced lie.  In 2004, Dale Burgess was assisting me with filing my 2003 tax return that included a K-1 from Traditional Holdings, LLC.  Why was that of interest to prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter?  What is the City Attorney's interest in Leonard Cohen's IRS matters?  That is the key essential question.  Streeter was aware that we issued a subpoena to Agent Tejeda/IRS and advised the judge at a sidebar (which was a LIE and is on the record) that the IRS had a holding re. Cohen's default judgment.  She attempted to prove (and failed miserably) that I was served Cohen's defautl judgment.  I was not.  In fact, the proof of service re. Cohen's summons and complaint is evidence of extrinsic fraud and the judgment is void.  It is also evidence of theft, the wrongful altering of my tax returns, and Cohen's position that he is the alter ego of TH and BMT and engaged in self-dealing. 

Leonard Cohen has stolen from me.  He has stolen from Steven and Marty Machat and Phll Spector.  He has a pattern of falsely accusing his advisers of ripping him off to breach contracts.  He has concealed evidence (and has a pattern of this - see the Stranger Music sale to Sony) re. corporations in his fraudulent lawsuit.

Stephen Gianelli continues to engage in criminal harassment, witness tampering, and is now targeting me and my son over Rutger's Whole Foods matter that the prosecutor and Cohen shamelessly raised in my insane Stalinesque Show Trial that featured Phil,Spector and yet another version of Cohen's highly embellished gun story about Phil Spector.  There are now three before LA Superior Court.  The prosecutor concealed one from my jurors.

All of this has been addressed in my Writ. 

Leonard Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh (copying in Michelle Rice, Cohen's lawyer - in direct violation of the restraining order), is also part of this highly coordinated campaign to target me, people close to me, and who is intent on slandering me for Leonard Cohen.  This matter involves Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Sandra Jo Streeter, and others.  See my trial transcript, appeal, and writ.  It also involves Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud.  Nothing he did was negligent.  It is fraud and he has tax and residence issues in Canada.  This man is pathetic and evidence of his personal conduct is his perjury at my trial, the insane Victim Impact Statement (lying about the IRS), and the fact that he and his lawyers clearly condone Susanne Walsh's ongoing harassment of me with Michelle Rice copied in.  Leonard Cohen's sense of entitlement is astounding.  So is his greed.  He feels entitled to lie, cheat, steal, perjure himself, target my sons, lie about me and Oliver Stone and others, encourage my younger son's father to take custody of him, and to obtain judgments, verdicts, and orders based on fraud, perjury, concealment, and lies.  The taxpayers are now paying for this activity and yet this man is not a U.S. citizen.  How did he own an S Corporation when he had abandoned his green card in 1989 and did not re-obtain one until 1993?  As Steven Machat noted - Leonard Cohen has created his own hell.  That includes with respect to Phil Spector.

All the best,
Kelley

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the DOJ,

The investigator I spoke with is also investigating the use of LAPD's TMU and the use of perjury in targeting innocent people.  He is planning to take his findings to the Los Angeles criminal grand jury.

NOTE:  I have been clear with everyone that LAPD's TMU has been entirely professional with me and I have no issues, whatsoever, with that Unit.  In fact, every single individual I have spoken with has been utterly professional and that is refreshing to note.  

Gianelli's obsession with me and matters related to Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector is frightening.  I think this is his job.  He reminds me of Pellicano. 

All the best,
Kelley

25 comments to Ex-husband of ‘NCIS’ star accused of violating restraining order

• James

February 25, 2013 at 1:26 pm · Reply

He was having dinner with his wife.

• OhYesHeDid

February 25, 2013 at 1:46 pm · Reply

Do your homework, James. He has stalked at least three women and pretends the reverse: that he’s the victim. He is a predator and seriously delusional. It’s always someone else’s fault? There are women in NY and LA who have been victims of him.

• Raíssa

February 25, 2013 at 2:26 pm · Reply

That’s bulsh**! I can’t believe the jury believed the lies of this psycho!

• KN

February 25, 2013 at 4:20 pm · Reply

They didn’t, hence the conviction.

• KN

February 25, 2013 at 3:35 pm · Reply

Convicted!

• JH

February 26, 2013 at 8:32 am · Reply

Once again, celebrity wins over star struck members of the jury pool… what else is new? Must feel real nice to know you’re in the same league as OJ Simpson. Congrats PP.

• DC

February 26, 2013 at 9:17 am · Reply

Have you ever had to call the cops when someone wouldn’t leave you alone when you asked them to? Have you ever been stalked? I have and it is an experience I never want to go through again. Maybe he follows her and maybe he knows the places she goes because he follows her. It sucks having to look over your shoulder all the time and not being able to live your life normally. Why do people always assume a celebrity doens’t go through the same stuff us regular people go through? Why do people always assume a celebrity’s status gets the law on their side all the time?

• JH

February 26, 2013 at 11:39 am · Reply

Showing up to eat at the same restaurant in Hollywood does not equate to stalking. That is what this guy got convicted of. Sorry, that is NOT stalking – and yes, I have been stalked by an actual stalker, so I know the difference.

• Kat

March 7, 2013 at 3:38 pm · Reply

I believe it DOES constitute stalking when he’s done it over and over with other women…always happens to show up where they are.

• Sadie

February 26, 2013 at 11:44 am · Reply

This dispicable excuse for a man has threatened and stalked more women than just Ms. Perrette. Like any abuser, he was charming at first, and soon became a nightmare. This is a pattern. He used these women to stay in the country and try to further his subpar music and acting career.

When that couldn’t happen he would take it out on them and move on to others he would use to try to get ahead. This is a pattern not only for him, but for other serial abusers, as well. Turning the tables and minimalizing what he was doing did not work, and the only ones seeing his point of view are other women-haters and groupies he managed to manipulate.

It wouldn’t be a surprise if he was the one writing some of the posts here and elsewhere as he has made a habit of doing so for years. This has kept his name in the press, which is what he wanted, by painting himself as the victim, which he is not. Why would he continue to be in the news if he didn’t feed into this and not let go of his ex’es? Answer: He wouldn’t be.

• Sadie

February 26, 2013 at 11:53 am · Reply

The police don’t question, arrest or detain someone for just having dinner. This was anyting but. Before and after this occurrance there was stalking and harrassment, and now it is time that it is properly brought to light for what it is; an angry, volitile ex-husband who didn’t get the fame or notoriety he wanted and took it out on his wives for not doing enough. And when they broke free he persisted with punishment by trying to turn the tables to draw attention to himself by playing the victim. He isn’t, and now the truth is finally coming out.

• Foreman

February 26, 2013 at 2:21 pm · Reply

The jury was opposite of star struck; they were embarrassed that she decided to unnecessarily lie on the stand and that this case took taxpayer dollars. He wasn’t convicted because he went to the restaurant, he was convicted because he decided to not walk away and instead whip out his phone and record her despite it being explicitly forbidden in his restraining order. They live in the same neighborhood and are both disturbing people. It was only a matter of time before this happened. Let’s not even get into the 600+ tweets in the last year aimed at her…

• Hopeful for Justice

February 27, 2013 at 12:17 pm · Reply

I am familiar with the FACTS of this case and I am disgusted.

The jury obviously was misled or missed the main point that AT NO TIME was Shivers even aware Perrette was in the restaurant. Shivers saw her BOYFRIEND and said he can’t sit there and began leaving the restaurant. As he was leaving the BOYFRIEND got up to assault Shivers who then held up his cellphone camera in self defense, capturing the BOYFRIEND on video. Shivers then asked the manager to save the security tape of the BOYFRIEND’s attempted assault, and then immediately left. Only after Shivers left did his wife (who asked him to go there) inform Shivers that she saw Perrette as well. Meaning NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED except for the BOYFRIEND’s threat/attempted assault. Once again an innocent man sent to jail.

If Perrette was a decent human being she would shrug it off and move on, but she has been waiting for this moment for years. I can see her now, rubbing her hands together with glee. This is Perrette’s vindictive payback for Mr. Shivers refusing to take her back and filing for divorce way back in 2004.

And let’s not even get into Perrette’s hundreds of posts about Shivers on her personal blog comparing him to Hurricane Katrina, Apartheid, and the Holocaust, in national interviews, and on her twitter account, where she has incited death threats against Shivers for years. This is a travesty of justice, and hopefully will forever become a giant black stain on her phony public image.

• Sean

February 28, 2013 at 11:36 am · Reply

Coyote, anyone with half a dead brain knows that you are “Hopeful for Justice.” You violated your restraining order and you’ve been cyberstalking Pauley for years. She hasn’t said ONE WORD about you.

Get over it. Move on. Get a life.

• Hopeful For Justice

February 28, 2013 at 10:39 pm · Reply

Actually, I am “Hopeful For Justice”, so please stop being so quick to accuse and condemn innocent people when you think you know what you are talking about. Thank you.

• KN

March 1, 2013 at 8:41 am · Reply

The jury was mislead or missed the point?! The prosecution presents their case. The defense presents their case. The jury makes a decision based on the evidence presented. They found him guilty based on that evidence. Man up. Do the crime; do the time.

• Coyote is Innocent

March 1, 2013 at 3:30 pm · Reply

Pauley Perrette has been hoping this would happen. He and his wife showed up at a restaurant by accident and then left. Give me a break. Real scary.

What is scary is how Pauley Perrette’s fame and fanatical stories actually persuade people to persecute other people. It’s a shame.

A good and innocent man will likely go to prison now. And for those who are happy about that, you should be ashamed of yourself.

• Odzer Chenma

March 13, 2013 at 9:14 am · Reply

One encounter does not warrant jail time. As a taxpayer, I find this situation appalling. Perrette ought to get a life. The City Attorney has way too much time and money on their hands. Another Hollywood celebrity gets the velvet glove treatment. It’s hard to believe that we had to pay for this insane trial. I’ve followed this story – the boyfriend attempted to assault Shivers and that was recorded. Perrette seems like a highly unstable woman.

• alisa

March 14, 2013 at 6:59 am · Reply

Odzer Chemda, I think I know who you are and would like to share my similar story with you.please contact me at alisaspitzberg@gmail.com

• alisa

March 14, 2013 at 6:55 am · Reply

There is no reason to believe Coyote Shivers is guilty from these set of facts. The fact that the Threat Management Unit and the city attorney is involved should give everyone great pause. Who was the judge? Was the restraining order allowed a collaterral attack? Pauly Perrette strikes me as a more glamourous Tig Notaro. Notaro an obscure comedian hired a law firm called Lavely and Singer and they in turn had this bogus Threat Management unit make it so she would win whatever she wanted to win. The city attorney is star struck and ready and able to convict the innocent. Trutanich is a moral free monster. I escaped a conviction by luck since I got one of the few not totally in the pockets of the filthy downtown court judges.The Kelly Lynch case too is very suspect, though I’m not completely familiar with it. I would be happy to share my experience in order to help. please contact me at alisaspitzberg@gmail.com

• Odzer Chenma

March 19, 2013 at 10:04 am · Reply

The City Attorney’s abuse of taxpayer dollars – on behalf of celebrities – is the actual scandal here. The City Attorney’s office is star struck. Alisa, contact me at kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com. See my blog – riverdeepbook.blogspot.com. Coyote Shivers is married to a darling and talented young woman and does not need to stalk anyone. Pauley Perrette is the individual who seems to be in dire need of psychiatric assistance. Perhaps the baby talk helps. Judges seem to fall for baby talk.

NOTE:  Stephen Gianelli who has criminally harassed me over Leonard Cohen, Cohen's tax fraud, his theft from me, Steven Machat and Cohen's theft from Machat, my son's Whole Foods matter, Phil Spector, and other issues, is a positive freak who is obsessed with me.  It does make one wonder if he is on someone's payroll.  And, he lies to the IRS and FBI, about the IRS, falsely accuses me of owing taxes.  I wasn't drunk on any voice mail message.  Leonard Cohen worked with a professional sound engineer and the tapes were altered with respect to sound, volume, and speed.  Here's the bottom line - there is due process in the U.S. Constitution and I was not served or notified of the 2011 California order.  The prosecutor and Gianelli attempt to confuse the issue with other fraudulent and deranged orders - including the one I REQUESTED in 2008 in Boulder, Colorado.  The judge gains jurisdiction over an individual by service of process.  This is a very very simple concept and only someone with motive (such as the City Attorney) would argue otherwise, abusing taxpayer dollars while doing so.

• StephenG

March 19, 2013 at 1:11 pm · Reply

Odzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.

There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.

HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.

• judy rose

March 24, 2013 at 2:34 pm · Reply

I have been reading the comments on this & agree & disagree, but the fact remains he was convicted, he had a lawyer & his day in court. So many things have crept into this that don’t belong.

• OhYesHeDid

March 25, 2013 at 12:02 pm · Reply

coyote shivers – “vexatious litigant” – look it up. and he deletes it from his wiki every time someone puts it back.

• Paul Edwards

March 26, 2013 at 4:44 pm · Reply

This dirtbag loser begs for money online to “free the wrongfully accused” (i.e. himself) yet posts self-worshiping photos of all his travels, courtesy of the in-laws money. This poser hasn’t sold a record in years, if ever. Look arsehole, if your latest skanky wife’s family has enough coin to pay for your gallivanting they can bloody well cough up for your mouthpiece. Better yet, since you have no talent (other than talking about yourself) just get a job and pay your own bills ya BUM!

• http://www.swrnn.com/2013/02/25/ex-husband-of-ncis-star-accused-of-violating-restraining-order/

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the IRS and FBI,

Gianelli continues with the highly organized campaign of harassment, slander, defamation, etc.  I spoke to the investigator on this case.  He is investigating the Coyote Shivers/Pauley Perrette matter.  He is also investigating the City Attorney's targeting of individuals over celebrities; fraudulent restraining orders; etc.  He could not understand 1) how Cohen filed a domestic violence order agianst me when I requested a civil harassment order in Boulder; 2) how I was arrested/prosecuted over an order (California - Gianelli lies about this; as did Streeter; etc.) that I was not served or notified of; and, 3) how I was arrested 400 miles from Los Angeles.  He spent 30 years on LAPD in homicide and is a national restraining order expert.  I'[ve sent him my writ of habeas corpus and other documents.

Gianelli has been advised to cease and desist.

All the best,
Kelley

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli,

Your obsession with me - and slander with respect to me - is extraordinary.  Do you spend all ay and night targeting me and lying about me - over Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Rutger's Whole Foods matter, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Deputy City Attorney Sandra  Jo Streeter and others.

I phoned the City Attorney's office yesterday re. your email allegations that they asked you to provide them with my address; your allegation that you forwarded them my email address; the ongoing harassment that included your copying in prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter on emails to me and my sister,  (whose lawyer advised you to cease and desist), and Michelle Rice's third party restraining order violations via emails Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, to me - with Rice copied in.

I claimed no such thing at trial, liar.  I have asked for - repeatedly tax information I require from Leonard Cohen including an IRS required 1099 for the year 2004; the withdrawal of the illegal K-1s issued by LC Investments, LLC (I am not a partner); an accounting (with corporate ownership interests addressed, Cohen's loans, transaction fees, Greenberg's commissions,etc. equity, liabilities, etc.); and so forth.

Leonard Cohen had me read to him in a bubble bath.  That would include documents related to the legal closing of Traditional Holdings, LLC which is why this was addressed with the iRS - and the incidents appear in Greenberg's lawsuit.  Leonard Cohen would have me read business and legal documents while he soaked in a bubble bath.  That is normally considered sexual harassment and indecent exposure.  You have written to me about this issue - including with respect to statutes of limitations.

Who knows what persuaded the jurors.  The fraud, perjury, concealment and lies are excessive.  One juror advised my PDs that he relied on Streeter's lies about TH assets being only $150,000 when Cohen's loans were millions.  They are assets. Streeter simply lied.  She also lied that Cohen provided me with the tax information I requested - including the IRS required 1099 for the year 2004. 

All of this, including Cohen's theft from me, has been addressed in my writ and elsewhere.  I embezzled nothing, liar. 

Kelley Lynch

StephenG

ch 19, 2013 at 1:11 pm · Reply

Odzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.
There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.
HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.

http://www.swrnn.com/2013/02/25/ex-husband-of-ncis-star-accused-of-violating-restraining-order/

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.