There's No Point In Glorifying Leonard Cohen - His Arrogance Is Astounding

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:45 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your email about "Cohen's perspective"
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the FBI,

Do you know what I've decided?  Leonard Cohen is insane.  I worked for a living.  Hard.  My money is not Leonard Cohen's.  He has stolen and withheld commissions for work I did.  He has stolen from Steven Machat.  He has stolen from Phil Spector.  He may have stolen from record producer Bob Johnston re. SMI.  And, what is he doing?  His lawyers appear to be condoning insanity with respect to Gianelli and Walsh.  This is pure Leonard Cohen.  Why is Leonard Cohen's fan writing the FBI, slandering me, and lying?  The IRS has the concealed evidence. 

Leonard Cohen has no respect for anyone.  Not the United Sates.  Not the IRS.  Not the FBI.  Not the DOJ.  Not the Treasury - being copied in on criminally harassing emails with member of my family. 

No one.  He just thinks he can lie and get away with it.  He goes from one insane narrative to another. 

Ask yourself this question:  Who would act like this?  Leonard Cohen.  Maybe he thinks he can hypnotize you.  Leonard Cohen wants to take me on in court, does he?  Good.  He lies on the stand as easily as he breaths.  The IRS is not pursuing me.  He knows what a K-1 is.  He's a smart ass.  He was amused on the stand.  He was almost laughing.  He is pathetic. 

No matter what this narcissist thinks.  He should be arrested.  Does Leonard Cohen think his fan's emails to the FBI are amusing? The man is sick.  His sense of entitlement is shocking.  He's a common thief.  There's no point in glorifying him.

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:17 PM
Subject: Your email about "Cohen's perspective"
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: Susanne Walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>


Regarding your musings about how Cohen might view an attempt by you to roll the case back to 2006 - "from Cohen's perspective I don't have any money" - let's face it, even when you "had money" you didn't have any money. All your high living was with Cohen's millions and you have never had wealth to speak of.

\

The sycophants and their idol worship re. a celebrity fraud.

That DOES NOT mean that ANY victim of embezzlement who has been harassed and trashed by the defendant would ever consider letting you off the hook.

 

The victims of embezzlement are me, Steven Machat,  and others.  Cohen needs to take a good, hard look in the mirror.  Does Leonard Cohen own Judge Freeman?  I guess he can boss him around then.  Maybe he can impress him with his lies, fraud, perjury, and concealment. 

If you believe that you have a great deal to learn about human nature.
STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188.  Sent from a moble device.

--

In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.