Friday, March 22, 2013

The Staggering Amount Of Energy Cohen's Operative, Stephen Gianelli, Puts Into Lying About Me, Targeting Me, Etc.



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM
Subject: Gianelli On Cohen and Spector
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>


Hello,

Gianelli should definitely call up Bruce Cutler and propose.  The amount of time he spends targeting me and lying about me is staggering.  Fortunately, people see right through him and LA Confidential.

All the best,
Kelley


Blogger Blogonaut said...
Lynch now writes:

“Gianelli has been clear about hearing from Cohen's representatives in 2009. He has relentles
sly (sic) targeted me since that time and is arguing Leonard Cohen's case.”

Look, Ms. Lynch, Michelle Rice emailed me in April of 2009 after I had already banned you from Blogonaut and was already engaged in the process of deleting your poisonous libelous comments. I did those two things because Blogonaut was in an uproar after you started posting your loquacious nonsense – six and seven long posts in a row, accusing named people of being engaged in the manufacture of meth, murder, child molestation, and other crimes for which they had never been convicted and because when I suggested you sounded “a little wound up and might want to talk to someone you went ballistic (indicating to me I hit a nerve and were probably mentally ill) – not because some lawyer who I did not know representing a recording artist I barely recalled from my high school days asked me to.
Gianelli sienced me when I spoke honestly on his blog about Phil Spector and stated the facts about Leonard Cohen.  That's why Gianelli heard from deranged Michelle Rice who had no qualms writing me, violating the restraining order, lying and copying in the IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, Ron Burkle, and possibly Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.  She lied about Judge Enichen.  She looked absolutely pathetic on the witness stand and sounded like your classic lying lawyer who will do anything for a buck.  She's made her entire career targeting me for Leonard Cohen.  Gianelli has relentlessly slandered me, targeted me since 2009, and targeted my children, elderly parents (actually calling them to intimidate them), sister and her husband (refused to cease and desist when he was advised to do so by her attorney and tried to blackmail her on his blog), my ex-husbands, and it just goes on and on.  The man clearly attempts to sabotage me and infiltrate matters related to Cohen's criminal tax fraud and Phil Spector.  I believe Investigator Frayeh's assumptions - this is a SHADY CHARACTER who probably found a sympathetic ear with unconscionable Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson whose rotten Major Fraud Unit elected not to prosecute Leonard Cohen for theft, fraud, etc.  Michelle Blaine was posting on Gianelli/Blogonaut's blog at this point.  The woman stole from Phil Spector after she wormed her way into her life.  In most realms this would be viewed as elderly abuse but no in LA Confidential.  It is revolting.  
I NEVER accused Leonard Cohen of manufacturing meth (although Streeter and Cohen attempted to prove this because they are psychotic) and have been very clear about the Dallas FBI's investigation into the Aryan Nation, a MURDER, the Cartel, METH LABS, and meth cooks that relates to a young acquaintance of mine's uncle.  I met this young acquaintance while homeless.  Cohen bankrupted me intentionally and his conduct now annoys him and he's concerned with his reputation.  The FBI was investigating a murder.  What's the issue?  Does Gianelli want to sabotage that.  I haven't named the subject of the FBI's investigation but Gianelli is just making it up as he goes along.  Freda Guttman, whose daughter allegedly heard Lorca Cohen say her father molested her, repeated this incident to Ann Diamond.  I have accused Leonard Cohen of nothing relating to that matter but wouldn't put anything past this lunatic based on what I have seen that he is capable of.
I sound a little worked up to a man who doesn't know me and has relentlessly targeted my children and everyone in my life?  How psychotic.  I have no mental health issues.  I have simply been dealing with the liar known as Leonard Cohen, LA Confidential, and some satellite clowns with motive.  A number of people are noting that Gianell is also a sycophant.  

You then started threatening me with a lawsuit for “defamation” (even though I had not yet referred to you publicly by name) and started writing the IRS and FBI, copy to the world, accusing me of “witness tampering”, and “obstruction of justice”.
Gianelli's ad hominem attacks on my character are outrageous.  They were coordinated with many others on the internet.  The evidence is there and people who look at it are referring to these lunatics as dangerously unstable people with obvious motive.  I continue to maintain that the IRS and FBI should charge, prosecute, and arrest Gianelli for egregious and outrageous witness tampering, witness intimidation, criminal harassment, stalking, and many other things.  Gianelli thinks that's an appropriate reason to then continue slandering and defaming me and file a fraudulent IRS form against me.  That is, I believe, criminal conduct.  Gianelli could care less.  He's emboldened.  On a real roll here.  

A week later I Googled my own name and found slanderous and hateful post after post posted on your (first of many serially taken down by Google at my request) blogs, the “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch” blog.
Michelle Blaine - a woman Cutler called a bald face thief and liar - wormed her way into Phil Spector's life; managed to get rid of Paulette Brandt; turned on Janice Zavala Spector also; and thanked Gianelli/Blogonaut publicly for targeting my blogs and email accounts.  I captured that evidence and forwarded it to Phil Spector and a number of federal agencies copied in on my emails.  

Then and only then did Blogonaut look into what your story was, and run the first of many articles on you. That was approximately June 4, 2009.
Who is Gianelli talking to?  Gianelli's probably fictional journalist - Joff Belark - then targeted me, emailed me for a story, and posted one long slanderous article that willfully disregarded every fact in this matter.  Yes, the lengths Gianelli has gone to target and discredit me are extraordinary.

In response you threatened to sue me for libel as soon as you heard from Bruce Cutler.
Gianelli should now call Bruce Cutler up and propose to him.  He name drops him relentlessly.  Perhaps Bruce Cutler will defend Gianelli.  The man is an absolute disgrace and I have been clear with Phil Spector about my views re. Bruce Cutler and his psychotic antics during my intent to annoy trial.  Definitely unimpressed with Cutler.  But I know sycophants like Gianelli and Streeter are.  

So I picked up the phone and put a call into Cutler, who called me back 10 minutes later and we enjoyed the first of several cordial phone conversations, initially for about an hour. I then learned that not only did Cutler have no intention of ever representing you, he did not even know you and regarded you “as the worst telephone stalker” he had ever met. He told me of you presuming to fill up his entire voice mail capacity every night with drunken, ranting, crazy stream of consciousness emails and of you spamming (his words) his fax machine with 50 and 100 page faxes that he never asked for and did not have the slightest interest in.
I think Gianelli's in love with Bruce Cutler.  He seems to have a need to go on and on about Cutler.  I've never met Cutler in my life and have been very clear about that.  I know Phil Spector and Cutler worked for him.  Now Gianelli's embellishing his story.  He never previously said my messages were drunken which they were not.  Cutler has also destroyed them.  Cutler's the worse advocate I've ever seen for someone like Phil Spector who is innocent.  I don't care if this dude represented God.  GIanelli should call him up and ask him to marry him.  Maybe Cohen, Kory, Rice, Cooley, Do, Streeter, Jackson, and Dixon can attend the wedding.  

You continue to email me incessantly, sometimes 40 emails a day. To date I received approximately 15,000 emails from you.
I have relentlessly advised this lunatic to cease and desist.  He refuses - even when advised by a lawyer to do so.  See my sister's lawyer.  

You attacked me publicly, demanded my prosecution from the IRS and the FBI, made public accusations against me of serious crimes with no basis, and gave me plenty of personal reasons to engage you and debunk your nonsense.
I have an absolute basis for my views on this dangerously unstable stark raving lunatic with motive.  

None of this creates a logical inference that I am aligned with, affiliated with, or in league with or am conspiring with Leonard Cohen, his lawyers, Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley, Sandra Jo Streeter or anyone else.
Conspiring?  Well, what we know is this.  Gianelli glorifies Cohen, his lawyers, Jackson, Cooley, and Streeter.  Most recently, he's defending the prosecutor who people in reality see right through.  In my community, LA Confidential looks corrupt and nasty.  That's why the word lunatics keeps coming up time and time again.  They're also aware of who Cooley is and voted against him in the AG election.  It was one of the first times the Bay Area weighed in on a Southern LA politician.  There's nothing logical about Gianelli or his conduct.  

Last, your disagreement with the characterization of the $7M in deposits and electronic transfers into your two accounts as “embezzlement” vs owed compensation is not what creates or defeats your criminal exposure to the IRS.
I've addressed ad nauseum and am addressing it privately with the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB.  The ledger is fraudulent.  My exposure to criminal tax fraud?  That would be Leonard Cohen's.  I have no exposure. My taxes have been paid.  

You received $10M in cash flow into your two accounts (including the Sony commission) from 1998 through 2004 – not because the Prins Declaration SAYS SO, but because the banking records attached to it PROVE SO.
The ever fluctuating numbers.  I'm going to prove nothing to this dangerously unstable stalker who has targeted everyone in my life for the most part.  He's a psychopath arguing Leonard Cohen's case and someone I think may have found a sympathetic ear witih Spector's prosecutor Alan Jackson.  The great news.  People are studying this activity on the internet and know I was targeted, railroaded, and Cohen is positively evil.  They should all remain delusional.  

Who owned Blue Mist or these other entities and what Cohen owed you or still owes you is not relevant to whether you listed this $10M cash on your 2008 to 2004 1040s.
The fact that I own 15% of all Cohen's intellectual property dating back to 1967 is highly relevant.  He's a thief who has withheld commissions I am owed; defrauded me of millions; has stolen from Machat & Machat; sold Phil Spector's master tapes to Sony; committed tax fraud; and is out of control.  The man's greed is inconceivable.  The numbers they toss around are constantly in flux and I have no intention of addressing the fraudulent ledger with Gianelli again.  The man is a stark raving lunatic who I believe the IRS and FBI should investigate and prosecute.
March 22, 2013 at 12:51 PM