Leonard Cohen's Operatives To Continue To Weigh In - Of Course They Are Absolute Strangers But Utterly Obsessed

Susanne Walsh said...

With exeption from Kelley Lynch, Leonard Cohen has NEVER been accused, arrested, charged, tried, convicted, sentenced or imprissoned for tax fraud,theft, fraud,harassment,public intoxication,slander,child abuse or ANYTHING else,

Yes, Streeter was spot on about this - the DA elected not to file criminal charges against Leonard Cohen.  I suppose that’s why his investigator was hanging out and lunching with Cohen while he testified about Phil Spector and a highly embellished version of the alleged gun story.  Of course, this doesn’t explain why prosecutor Streeter continues to conceal the fact that she is in receipt of an email - from Cohen - that provides a contradictory version of the Phil Spector gun story.  Both of these versions - brought to you via the City Attorney’s office - contradict the version Phil Spector’s prosecutors used in his trials.  According to Mick Brown/UK Telegraph, Cohen’s statements were presented to the Grand Jury.  He has reviewed the transcripts.  And, they were most certainly used in prosecution motions.  But, which version does the government believe? And then there’s the version where there’s a bottle of wine in Phillip’s hand.   Our government has most certainly gone the distance for Leonard Cohen, Canada’s National Treasure who cannot live in Canada due to residence/tax problems.  Or, to quote Cohen - Canada Revenúe asks where you paid your taxes the prior year while the IRS does not.  Hence, an abandoned and re-obtained green card scenario.  


Ms. Lynch on the other hand has experienced all of the above, and still she continues to throw vile and obscene accusations and slander at Mr. Cohen (and Mr. Gianelli), and claim that SHE is the innocent victim of Cohen, Kory, Gianelli Ms. Streeter and a "corrupt" LA court system where procecuters, judges and jurors are "fraudulent liers and starstruck idiots".

I haven’t used the phrase “starstruck idiots” from what I recall.  I have used the word “sycophants.”  Gianelli has relentlessly targeted me from 2009 and now views himself as a victim.  How rich.  Walsh clearly does not live in the Bay Area where people are now discussing the corruption in Los Angeles.  

If the LA court sysem had believed Ms. Lynch and aquittet her of her crimes, it WOULD have been corrupt, worthless, without credibillity and just as crazy as Ms. Lynch. There has never been any testimonies to support Lynch's slander and accusations of Mr. Cohen,on the contrary, thousands testifies that he is a kind, reasonable, fair and loyal man, and I am not talking about "cult victims", but his staff of a lifetime, journalists, concert promotors, eks-girlfriends, employers (of course with exception of the one who showed him the ultimate betrayal and disloyalty), even Steven Marchart and Kelley Lynch's own children have stated that "Leonard Cohen is a very nice man, and that they are on good terms with him".

Who are these thousands testifying to Cohen’s kindness?  A group of fans who don’t know him at all?  Steven Machat has called Leonard Cohen a fraud.  He has also been quite clear - Leonard Cohen stole from him and his father.  Walsh thinks my sons like Leonard Cohen?  Well, the judge refused to permit my older son to take the witness stand so Cohen’s delusional if he thinks that.  What sick people.  Then again, Leonard Cohen spent a lifetime - or so it seemed - attempting to turn his children against their mother and, as someone noted this morning, he thinks like a neurotic woman and hides behind his OPERATIVES.  In other words, they noted that he is a conniving and manipulative lunatic.  

March 16, 2013 at 5:59 AM

Blogonaut said...
Kelley Lynch writes:

“The expense ledger is fraudulent. Have you ever heard of an accounting that omits corporate ownership interests; assets; liabilities; and equity?”

The Declaration of Kevin L. Prins of the 100 year old National accounting firm Moss Adams, details of how Kelley Lynch diverted $7M from 2008 through 2004 from Leonard Cohen owned entities under Lynch’s control to two checking accounts she owed (personal checking and Stranger Management) IN ADDITION TO the 10% (later raised to 15%) commission compensation to which Lynch was entitled.

Prins no longer works for Moss Adams.  I’ve spoken with their managing partner about this situation.  Leonard Cohen is lying that we had an agreement re. 10% that was later raised to 15%.  Our agreement was 15% which is the standard commission for a personal manager.  Leonard Cohen doesn’t own Traditional Holdings or Blue Mist Touring and his ongoing reckless disregard for corporate governance, etc. proves that he views himself as the alter-ego who engaged in self-dealing.  The ledger willfully disregards all corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, and equity.  Prins met with my accountant (who has NOT fired and who advised me to inform the Treasury agents I met with that he witnessed Cohen’s offer of 50% community property - via Robert Kory) and was clear:  he didn’t have the corporate documents to properly prepare an accounting.  I suppose the fraudulent expense ledger had to suffice.  This, however, doesn’t explain the illegal K-1s that totally undermine the fraudulent expense ledger.  

Setting aside whether these sums were “legitimate” compensation or theft, the Prins Declaration is supported with 90+ pages of front and back copies of cancelled checks, account statements for the Cohen owned accounts and the Kelley Lynch owned accounts and other bank records that prove to the penny and beyond a reasonable doubt the exact amounts TO THE PENNY that Kelley Lynch was depositing into her two checking accounts as Cohen’s manager from 1998 to 2004:

Really?  Why set reality aside?  Because Leonard Cohen feels entitled to steal my share of intellectual property back?  The man dictated the minutes and understood that the assignments were non-revocable.  They date back to 1967 and these assets appear nowhere on the expense ledger which should be thrown in the garbage. The accounting needs to be based on royalty statements and actual income.  

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29620593/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Prins-Dec

Whether Kelley Lynch was provided with the Prins Declaration and attached cancelled checks and account statements in 2006 when the judgment was entered against her or in April of 2010 (when we originally downloaded the Prins Declaration from the LA Court website and posted it on Scribd.com and Lynch emailed us claiming this was the first time she read it), there is NO DOUBT that PRIOR to the obscene and harassing emails and voice mails to Leonard Cohen a year later that she was criminally charged with, SHE HAD ALL INFORMATION IN HER POSSESSION NECESSARY TO FILE HER 2004 FEDERAL AND STATE TAX RETURNS.
How much cash did Lynch deposit into her two checking accounts in 2004?

Gianelli appears to view himself as Leonard Cohen’s lawyer which is quite bizarre.  And yet, he received a letter from Cohen’s lawyers asking him to stop?  If so, that seems to have been planned.  The judgment was entered against me in May 2006 - not April 2010.  I do not have the tax documentation I need; Gianelli does not know me; and I have asked the IRS for a formal opinion on this matter.  Furthermore, I’ve discussed the situation in detail with Doug Davis/FTB.  And, the IRS just advised me to file fraud form 3949a with respect to the illegal K-1s Cohen’s entity issued and transmitted to the State of Kentucky and IRS although he is the sole owner.  Leonard Cohen is obscene.  I am now detailing this for my attorney.  

All she needed to do, and needs to do today, to file her 2004 returns is to consult the Prins Declaration + Exhibits.

The Prins declaration/exhibits are evidence of fraud.  Leonard Cohen simply does NOT want to address what was income to me.  I see right through him and his rotten lawyers.  

If she does not believe the math of an accounting firm that does audit work for publicly traded corporations, she could have pulled out her own calculator and added up the cancelled checks (which are copied front and back and attached to the Prins Declaration) and electronic wire transfers she effected from Cohen’s accounts to her’s, plug those numbers into Turbo Tax and file the returns.

Why would I believe the math of a man who is willfully overlooking corporate books and records, non-revocable assignments, etc?  I’ve asked the IRS to prepare the appropriate accounting.  Gianelli has an obsessive interest in my tax returns and publicly lied when he stated I didn’t file 1994 and 1995 returns and willfully attempted to evade taxes.  The man will say anything and seems to have a keen interest in sabotaging the IRS also.  I wonder what his motive actually is?

There was no need to pester Cohen or his advisors in violation of the 2009 Protective Order she was charged with violating, let alone by emailing Cohen that he has a “tiny penis” and leaving drunken and abusive voice messages that “Cohen should be taken out and shot”.

As Detective Viramontes/LAPD and I just discussed - why didn’t Cohen just hand over the tax documents?  The abusive individual here is Leonard Cohen who continues to employ and hide behind his operatives.  The Scientist will ultimately review the voice mail messages and advise on how they were tampered with - re. sound, volume, distortion through copying in various formats, and speed.  Leonard Cohen actually worked with a recording engineer on this?  I guess he's not that sidetracked with his creative endeavors since he appeared obsessed with me.  If Leonard Cohen doesn't want people discussing his penis, he shouldn't bath in front of them.  It's known as sexual harassment.  Leonard Cohen has a very long history of legal and illegal drug abuse, lied on the stand that I attempted to assail his reputation over his conduct; and actually thinks slander is a defense to tax fraud, theft, etc?  Well, this is NOT playing out in the news media any longer.  It's in a court of law and Gianelli's clear - the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan are copied in on my emails.  So was Streeter.  So was Cohen.  That's why he's alarmed.  And, as my lawyers addressed with him - he's concerned people will believe the truth about him.  So, he must continue to hide behind his operatives who appear to be arguing their case to one another.  As Frauncisco Suarez noted - this trial is an IRS matter and demands an investigation.  My public defender adevised me that he felt Streeter attempted to sabotage the IRS and the DA doesn't want the Phil Spector verdict overturned.  Leonard Cohen's fraudulent expense ledger - that is totally undermined by his illegal K-1s - will not change the fact that there are now three Phil Spector gun stories before LA Superior Court and those are his highly embellished stories.  Two must be perjured.   The version Streeter concealed from my jurors is about to be addressed with the appellate division - as will her lies and the perjured testimony.   

This is what Susan Walsh is referring to when she says Kelley Lynch has never explained how millions of dollars of Cohen’s money made its way into her personal checking account and her Stranger management account.

Leonard Cohen has taken the position that he is the alter-ego who has engaged in self-dealing.  His loans from Traditional Holdings, LLC were dangerous to the structure itself.  He refused to pay these loans back, within three years, at 6% interest.  Bought houses for his girlfriend and son with corporate assets.  Used the assets like his own piggy bank.  My ownership interest in the IP is NOT Leonard Cohen’s money and I have not seen a proper accounting.  Cohen feels comfortable lying through his teeth and I’ve been clear with the IRS - the fraudulent expense ledger needs to be slam dunked into the trash can.  Cohen doesn’t know what column his son’s house belongs in?  How bizarre.  

But don’t take our word for it, read the Kevin L. Prins Declaration yourself, and then scroll down to the attached front and back copies of checks deposited directly into Kelley Lynch’s account and the account statements themselves.

Who is this dangerously unstable, stark raving lunatic talking to?  

Ms. Lynch can call this a fraud till she is blue in the face, but cancelled checks and bank statements are no “fraud” and they are no “ledger”.

The ledger is a ledger and corporate books and records are being willfully overlooked.  As Boies Schiller said - Leonard Cohen is now going into court to prove that he himself committed tax fraud.  I think he’s done a good job of that.  Where are Cohen’s bank statements with his personal expenses - paid for with corporate assets - addressed, etc?

March 16, 2013 at 6:01 AM

Blogonaut said...
One more thing.

Lynch has posted testimony from her harassment trial wherein she claimed that she needed "tax information" from Cohen because when she "became homeless" she "lost everything" and had no records.

But as recently as April of 2010 - when Lynch was living with her son in Los Angeles (and also in 2009), Lynch was emailing us and also blogging that she had books and records pertaining to her association with Cohen in her son's storage space.

The IRS just confirmed that they do not have the required 1099 form for the year 2004.  How would Gianelli know what I had/have in storage?  The IRS Commissioner’s Staff should have a good idea - since I’ve provided them with most, if not all, of the evidence.

This woman cannot keep track of her own statements.

Several commenters took her to task at the time for involving her son in all of this, and Lynch then accused several commenters of threatening her son, so I recall this very well.

Leonard Cohen targeted my sons.  Make no mistake about that.  His testimony about Rutger’s Whole Food incident was and remains sickening.  The great news - people in reality see right through him and his operatives.  They don’t believe it was a coincidence that Cohen, his lawyers/PI, were hanging out and lunching with the DA’s investigator during a trial where Cohen testified about ONE VERSION of his good rock and roll story about Phil Spector that he used to advance his career.  In any event, I’ve heard directly from Phil Spector on the matter.  Gianelli can have Cutler.  I have also been in touch with Dennis Riordan.


March 16, 2013 at 7:49 AM

Blogonaut said...
Lynch now writes, referring to the Prins Declaration + attachments:

“These records are fraudulent. Gianelli obviously has motive.”

From my pesrpective, he either has motive or is criminally insane.  Addressed the following ad nauseum with the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan.  Scott Edelman called me to advise that he no longer represents Leonard Cohen.  Yes, Leonard Cohen needs it to appear this way - after all, his greed has caught up with him and the tax fraud - which is obviously not negligence - is egregious.  And yet, he takes the stand and testifies about the IRS, DOJ, etc. and lies through his teeth about the refund and default judgment that I have now challenged with the IRS via their form 3949a.  The zero sum game is not over but I assume the IRS is aware that Kory lies about them also since Agent Bill Betzer/IRS advised me to report the tax fraud to their Fraud Unit and I never read an ad.  Leonard Cohen’s paid lying advocates are really willing to go the mile for him.  I’ll quote Cohen’s former lawyer now (Ed Dean):  The IRS Commissioner himself should or will come in after Cohen’s advisers also.

First, the Prins Declaration was downloaded from the LA Superior Court website, as anyone with a credit card can do to double check its authenticity, and in any event it is endorse filed by the court.

Second, the records attached to the declaration clearly consist of front and back copies of canceled checks deposited into Lynch’s accounts as well has her (and Cohen’s) bank statements.

So how are these records “fraudulent”?

Is she saying that a partner of one of the most respected law firms in the United States, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (who submitted the Prins Declaration to the LA court) or Moss Adams, a 100 year old accounting firm that does public audit work, spent the time to forge each and every front and back copy of each cancelled check and each of these account statements to make it appear that Lynch deposited $7M into her personal checking account and her Stranger Management account from various Cohen accounts, when she received none of this cash?

Please.
March 16, 2013 at 8:02 AM