Kelley's Email To the IRS And FBI Re. Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud And Stephen Gianelli's Lies To The IRS About Me - Cohen Is Legally Obligated To Provide Me With A 1099. What's The Issue? Why Go To Such Extreme Lengths To Avoid Providing Someone With The IRS Required Form 1099?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Right On Cue - Kelly Green Is Back On Gianelli/Blogonaut's Law Group Trashing Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>


To the IRS and FBI,

See my comments below.  Gianelli's back to his obsession with respect to Cohen's tax fraud and the form 1099 he is required  provide me.  Of course, Gianelli LIED to the IRS about my owing taxes and has no evidence to prove that because it's a bald faced lie.  Therefore, he needs to be prosecuted over that situation.  His lies and slander cannot change that fact.  

All the best,

Kelley

 Blogonaut said...

KL, who follows this blog closely has already responded!

I am not following Gianelli/Blogonaut's Blog.  I am capturing evidence of slander, defamation, etc.  This man's obsession with me is positively psychotic.  Gianelli thinks it's crazy that I've asked Phil Spector to investigate this situation?  Well, Gianelli clearly doesn't know Phil Spector.  He can assume whatever he wants.  The man is dangerously unstable and a stark raving lunatic with motive.

By confirming everything we believe about her crazyness:

"I've Asked Phil Spector's Legal Team To Investigate This Situation With Stephen Gianelli, Leonard Cohen, Possibly Alan Jackson, Sandra Jo Streeter, Etc.

"From: Kelley Lynch
Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: Cyber Stalking
To: Washington Field , "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ , "Kelly.Sopko" , Dennis , "Doug.Davis"
Cc: Richard Dallett


"Mr. Riordan,


"My stalker is going to great lengths here. He seems desperate and this activity has crossed many state borders. I would like Phil Spector's legal team to investigate whether or not he has a connection to Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson. It seems obvious that prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter does. She certain name dropped Cooley and Jackson enough and had a DA's investigator in the courtroom who was hanging out and lunching with Cohen and his lawyers/PIs. Terribly LA Confidential. Looked like an outright legal conspiracy from my perspective.


"Gianelli is obsessed with me. This is criminal stalking and a lot worse. The IRS
should arrest him for lying about my owing taxes. Who does this luantic think he is? Oh, I know - he waved to you, Phil Spector's appellate attorney, and thinks you should ignore Leonard Cohen's three highly embellished Phil Spector gun stories before LA Superior Court. Well, one additional one should be - in my trial - but my so-called prosecutor is concealing it for the time being.


Love,
Kelley"

We tried to explain to Ms. Lynch that after 15,000 emails to the IRS, FBI and the press, and thousands of blog posts, all falsely accusing me of everthing from child molestation, being "gay", to "witness tampering: and "obstruction of justice" commencing the week we banned her from these pages in April of 2009, it is not necessary to posit a "connection"or a "conspiracy" to support anyone who has also been harassed by Kelley Lynch.

Gianelli has endlessly been advised to cease and desist.  That would include by my sister's attorney.  He does not understand this legal concept and then wrote me, copying in the prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter (which is a legal outrage) and Cohen's lawyer (Rice who has made a career targeting me) in an attempt to have me violate the restraining order.  Why?  Because this madman knows I hit reply all and advise him to CEASE AND DESIST.  I discussed this incident with Detective Viramontes/LAPD and advised him of the ongoing criminal harassment my family and I have experienced with respect to Stephen Gianelli, etc.  I haven't accused Gianelli of child molestation.  He attempted to lure (and was possibly successful) my son (a minor at that time) into privately communicating with him.  I have no idea who this adult male stranger is and, as a parent, view every stranger who attempts to lure my children into communicating with them as a potential sexual predator and possible NAMBLA member.  This was addressed during my trial when Streeter attempted to elicit perjured testimony from Cohen that actually related to Gianelli and not Cohen.  I have been very clear with the IRS and FBI about Gianelli and my position that he has engaged in egregious criminal witness tampering, witness intimidating, stalking, harassment, etc.  That's probably why he transmitted fraud to the IRS and lied to them about  my owing taxes.  This man has no idea about my taxes, tax returns, what I have paid the IRS.  This man does not know me and you cannot simply lie to the IRS.  I, on the other hand, provided the IRS with an abundance of evidence regarding Leonard Cohen's probable criminal tax fraud.

It the words of an ancient proverb with both Arabic and Chinese attribution: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

This may be too subtle of a concept for Kelley Lynch to grasp.

There's nothing subtle about this.  See the DA and Leonard Cohen in my intent to annoy trial.  I find the logic flawed myself.  

March 17, 2013 at 11:33 AM

 Blogonaut said...

KL now writes:

“Kelly Green (who also appeared on the Darwin Exception - a blog that seemed dedicated to glorifying Alan Jackson and affiliated with Sprocket's blog) always reminds me of Alan Jackson - and, right on cue, Green weighs in. What's the topic now? Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen's three versions of the Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court.”

As usual, Ms. Lynch you miss the point, which has always been – and remains – how crazy you are.

What an arrogant idiot.  This man actually thinks he is writing me?  

What part of "How in hell has this thug avoided a 5150 hearing?" do you find confusing?

I have no idea why these thugs aren't in criminal asylums or prison.  It's frightening to think of who else they have or are targeting.

Were did you see a reference to Spector and/or Cohen in that sentence?

What stark raving lunatics.  Well, as lawyers are noting - Gianelli's vicious, has motive, but is an idiot.

March 17, 2013 at 11:53 AM

 Blogonaut said...

Okay, here is something about KL’s excuse for harassing Cohen since he fired her for theft in 2004 that we don’t follow: That Cohen “owes” her a Form 1099 so she can calculate her gross income in aid of filing her 2004 federal and state tax returns, and her incessant email and voice mail communications in violation of the 2009 Colorado Protective Order (later registered in California) were legitimately in aid of that quest. 

Leonard Cohen didn't fire me.  He heard I was reporting his tax fraud to the IRS and I refused to meet with him, his tax lawyer, or hand over the corporate books and records and help them unravel their deranged handiwork.  Cohen owes me form  1099 and the IRS requires him to provide me with this form.  The illegal K-1s he transmitted to the IRS and State of Kentucky completely undermine his fraudulent expense ledger.  The order may have been registered in California but I wasn't served or notified and the court cannot possibly have jurisdiction over me.  Perhaps the court missed that day of law in law school. God knows.  

But when we pointed out that the 2004 income Lynch derived from Cohen in 2004 is very clearly set forth in the Declaration of CPA Kevin L. Prins filed in 2006 in Cohen’s Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit against the his former manager (and has been public record even since), Lynch dismisses this source as “fraudulent” and untrustworthy.

Kevin Prins willfully disregarded the corporate books and records he discussed with my accountant, Dale Burgess who was not fired but completed my tax returns and advised me what was due the IRS through 2003.  He also advised me that if TH was removed from my returns, I would have a carry back.  I paid substantial taxes in 2003 re. Traditional Holdings (although Cohen has defrauded me of my ownership interest) and did not believe I was making a charitable contribution to the IRS on Cohen's behalf.  Well, I didn't receive overpayments re. my personal management commission.  Cohen just concealed evidence from the court and perjured himself when he said he was the sole beneficial owner of  Blue Mist Touring and Traditional Holdings.  The court cannot possibly have jurisdiction over two corporations that are not named as parties to the suit and no trust exists with respect to these entities.  

My confusion is, if Kelley Lynch does not trust a statement of the aggregate amounts from Cohen that Lynch deposited in her two accounts in 2004 ($544,606.00) as set forth in a declaration under penalty of perjury from a Certified Public Accountant who personally reviewed the supporting bank records, why would she seek – let alone trust – a Form 1999 setting forth the same income figure prepared by Cohen’s bookkeeper? 

I trust NOTHING about the fraudulent expense records and certain deposits are not in my handwriting or anyone's handwriting that I recognize and I would need to see original documents, royalty statements, etc.  The IRS requires Cohen to provide me with a 1099 for the year 2004.  PERIOD.  

This inconsistency cannot be reconciled.

Whatever.  This man's obsession with me is psychotic.  I have advised the IRS and FBI that I want his fraudulent and criminal allegations that I owe taxes to the IRS investigated.  This man is out of his 

Clearly, the 1099 issue was an excuse to pursue and harass Leonard Cohen in violation of a court order – as a Los Angeles jury found in 2012 when it convicted her of the multiple misdemeanor counts underpinning her 18 month jail sentence and court ordered mental health evaluation. 

Clearly the IRS requires Cohen to provide me with this document and as Detective Viramontes/LAPD and I discussed - why didn't Cohen simply provide me with this document and the other information I requested?  The jury was presented with a tremendous amount of perjured testimony, lies, etc.  Gianelli doesn't need a mental health evaluation - although I view him as dangerously unstable - he needs to be prosecuted for his conduct with respect to me and my family and, in particular, my children.  Criminal harassment and witness intimidation hardly begins to describe this situation.  

March 17, 2013 at 12:46 PM