From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Section F - Appeal Brief - Agent Tejeda
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Hi,
I think the illustrious author is confusing issues. I was told the Boulder order expired. I wasn't served or notified the unlawful and - according to the lawyer I spoke to yesterday - fraudulent and insane domestic violence order. California Courts have no jurisdiction. They have a lot of nerve quoting anything having to do with Boulder. Rice lied about Judge Enichen. Kory lied about Judge Babcock. That's fine. These judges tolerate lies and perjury and therefore people feel free to lie about them. I wasn't notified or served the fraudulent California order. They can quote legal precedence until the cows come home. And, they're still lying. Maybe my book should be called Liars, Inc.
All the best,
Kelley
Further, in People v. Scaffell 1948 74 Cal. App.2nd Supp. 967, the court held one who is not a party to an action and who has never been formally served with a restraining order made therein may, nevertheless be guilty of contempt of court in violating such order if he has knowledge of the order. Id. At 978-979; see also People v. Hadley 1924 66 Cal.App.370, 379 [to be punÃshed for contempt, a person must either have actual notice or be personally served]; In re. Felthoven 1946 75 Cal.App.2d 465, 468 [to punish for contempt “it must appear … the order upon which the contempt proceeding is based has been served on the accused, or he was present when the order was made, or he had knowledge of it.”
Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Section F - Appeal Brief - Agent Tejeda
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Hi,
I think the illustrious author is confusing issues. I was told the Boulder order expired. I wasn't served or notified the unlawful and - according to the lawyer I spoke to yesterday - fraudulent and insane domestic violence order. California Courts have no jurisdiction. They have a lot of nerve quoting anything having to do with Boulder. Rice lied about Judge Enichen. Kory lied about Judge Babcock. That's fine. These judges tolerate lies and perjury and therefore people feel free to lie about them. I wasn't notified or served the fraudulent California order. They can quote legal precedence until the cows come home. And, they're still lying. Maybe my book should be called Liars, Inc.
All the best,
Kelley
Further, in People v. Scaffell 1948 74 Cal. App.2nd Supp. 967, the court held one who is not a party to an action and who has never been formally served with a restraining order made therein may, nevertheless be guilty of contempt of court in violating such order if he has knowledge of the order. Id. At 978-979; see also People v. Hadley 1924 66 Cal.App.370, 379 [to be punÃshed for contempt, a person must either have actual notice or be personally served]; In re. Felthoven 1946 75 Cal.App.2d 465, 468 [to punish for contempt “it must appear … the order upon which the contempt proceeding is based has been served on the accused, or he was present when the order was made, or he had knowledge of it.”
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”