From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Gianelli
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the FBI,
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Gianelli
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the FBI,
Gianelli's frightening obsession with me continues. We are filing a motion or writ and I am preparing a document with all the prosecutorial lies, witness perjury, etc. The lies are so excessive that I believe the decision to abandon the appeal was involuntary but a court in LA is not going to force me to engage in the insanity with the City Attorney's office. Leonard Cohen testified about Phil Spector. The prosecutor concealed an email that would have proved he perjured himself or changed the version of the gun story. The DA"s investigator was hanging out in the courtroom and lunching with Cohen. Do the math. This is not brain surgery. Cooley and Jackson were constantly raised as issues. Streeter concealed the fact that Mick Brown advised me that Cohen testified before the grand jury. It turns out that Cohen's statements were presented the Grand Jury and there appears to be an issue with statements being referred to as testimony in the UK.
Does this lying lawyer who has relentlessly targeted me since 2009 have a job:?
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut said...- KL has posted on her blog a letter to her court appointed appellate lawyer Francisco Suarez, stating in part:
“I want to appeal this to the California Supreme Court if necessary.”
If we understand her correctly, Kelley Lynch believes that her criminal conviction reulted from perjured testimony, prosecutorial misconduct in the form of “lies” told by Sandra Jo Streeter, and a “conspiracy” between the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, Cohen, and the City Attorney (as evinced by Cohen luching with a DA investigator during the trial), but she wants to abandon her appeal from the criminal conviction.
See here:
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2013/03/kelley-lynch-vs- la-confidential-and.html
Instead of apealing her alleged corruptly obtained conviction, though, she now wishes to appeal the Appellate Department’s denial of her abandonment/request to dismiss her apeal on the merits all the way to the California Supreme Court if necessary?
Huh?!
NEWSFLASH for Ms. Lynch and her procerurally challanged court appointed counsel: The denial of your bid to dismiss your appeal is a NONAPPEALABLE ORDER. That means it cannot be appealed, not to the Court of Appeal, not to the California Supreme Court.
This is a the routine disposition of a procedrual matter entirely within the discretion of the Appellate Department, that no reviewing court would desturb even if it could.
In fact, Ms. Lynch, your pleading – which implies that your decision to withdraw your appeal was INVOLUNTARY and the result of (unspecified) “retaliation” by Sandra Jo Streeter – left the Appellate Department with little choice but to deny the request.
This is not complicated stuff.
Your client is crazy, Mr. Suarez, but what’s your excuse?March 14, 2013 at 1:39 PM
