Saturday, March 16, 2013

I Don't Owe The IRS Taxes But I Think Gianelli's View Of The Analysis Is Moronic And Overly Simplified - In Any Event, Gianelli Will Prove I Owe Taxes When Hell Freezes Over Because I Don't And He Doesn't Know Me, Doesn't Have Access To My Tax Documents, Etc.



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM
Subject: I Think The IRS Analysis Will Have To Be A Bit More Detailed
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>


To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

I think Gianelli's version of an IRS analysis is far too simplistic.  I know this for a fact.  I don't owe the IRS a penny and
Gianelli has now criminally transmitted fraud to the IRS about me.  This man is aligned with Leonard Cohen and possibly Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson so this retaliation is heavy.  It's perfectly LA Confidential.  I wonder if my trial lawyers want him to testify about something?  They don't represent me anymore.  The Intent to Annoy set up is over.  I'm abandoning the appeal due to prosecutorial misconduct, perjury, etc. and the appellate division is NOT forcing me to engage in any further insanity with LA Confidential.  They can have Sandra Jo Streeter to themselves.  It's a marriage made in hell.

All the best,
Kelley

The way this will work is that in response to the 3949-A the IRS will obtain copies of the relevant banking records via administrative subpoena, do a side by side comparison of those deposits with your 1040's (if any) for the years in question, and then if there is underreporting, the matter will be submitted to a federal grand jury.
Really?  I suppose Gianelli really thinks the IRS Commissioner's Staff is filled with morons who don't understand precisely what is going on here.  In any event, I will now call Agent Tejeda/IRS and Agent Wynar/FBI about the fraud Gianelli has transmitted to the IRS.  

I think the IRS evaluation will require a far more detailed analysis.  First of all, they'll have to look at Kevin Prins' declaration vis a vis the corporate books and records to determine that Prins and Cohen have willfully disregarded corporate books and records.  The IRS will have to conclude that Leonard Cohen has taken the position that he's the alter ego of these entities who engaged in self-dealing.  They'll have to conclude what Agent Betzer/IRS concluded - that I am the rightful owner of 99.5% of TH and 15% of BMT and all intellectual property dating back to 1967.  The IRS won't be able to look at a 1099 from Leonard Cohen for the year 2004 because he failed to provide me with one and there are steep penalties for doing so.  The IRS will have to look at all Sony royalty statements, or simply obtain, overall sales figures on album sales, etc. and do the math.  The latter suggestion is simpler and far more expedient.  The IRS will have to sit down and look at the millions in losses I have for the years 2004 and 2005 which includes the loss of two businesses and a theft loss worth nearly half a million dollars.  LAPD came to my house over that - after Ray's soccer coach and a Toronto police officer notified them that I was being robbed.  The IRS will have to remove the tax payments I've made on TH from my returns since Leonard Cohen has taken the position thathe's the alter ego and I didn't make charitable donations, on his behalf, to the IRS.  And, the IRS will have to look at all my tax payments.  Gianelli, however, cannot do this and is not entitled to my records and cannot simply falsely allege that I have committed tax evasion.  He can continue  to lie to the IRS and FBI and I can continue to advise them that he should be arrested for criminal witness tampering, criminal witness harassment, an attempt to obstruct justice, and a lot more.  These are more personal opinions of a man I view as dangerously unstable and someone with M.O.T.I.V.E.  The FBI can decide for themselves if parents should view strange adult males who attempt to lure their minor children into privately communicating with them as potential sexual predators and possible NAMBLA members.  



-- 
Question: How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road? 
Answer: With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.