From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Appeal
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Hello DOJ,
This is Cohen's testimony about the IRS refund. The IRS binder in Streeter's possession contains evidence that Cohen and his lawyers were concerned about the allegations brought to the IRS nearly a year after the refund was obtained. The IRS does not have a 1099 for me for the year 2004. I do not have one. The forensic ledger is fraudulent and the K-1s totally undermine them because they note that I had $0 income on LCI for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005. The IRS just advised me recently to call Cohen and ask him to rescind the illegal K-1s. And yet, the City Attorney is essentially arguing that I have my federal tax document. I do not have an accounting. There is a fraudulent ledger. An accounting takes corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, and equity into consideration. Who would LIKE an accounting that didn't? It's called theft. So, I will address the evidence - in the IRS binder - that was concealed. My declaration will address key issues and it will address how I view the prosecutor's lies to LAPD about me: as retaliation over my appeal and for requesting an investigation into this entirely insane matter. I have no idea what right the City Attorney has to even address tax matters and it is disturbing. I will also address other threats I've received when I have publicly noted that I intend to move legally against Leonard Cohen. It is outrageous and it is unconscionable. One must wonder about the conduct of the City Attorney's office. I don't have the tax documents; the K-1s are evidence of criminal conduct; the default judgment is fraudulent and based on perjury and willful concealment of corporate books and records; and this story just goes on and on. So, I'll address the key elements. This document takes things out of context. I don't think there was one hidden request for tax information in thousands of documents but the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB should review those documents to see what I addressed. These people lie.
I didn't know about the California order; thought the Boulder order expired; and the California order was fraudulently filed. Two lawyers have now confirmed that for me. I wasn't in a dating relationship with Cohen and the City Attorney doesn't seem to understand California case law regarding the definition of "dating relationship" so why bother continuing with absolute abject insanity?
Leonard Cohen is a man who cannot live in Canada because he has tax and residence problems there. He comes to this country and, from what I can tell, defrauds the U.S. government and uses perjury, fraud, lies, and concealment to blame his wrongdoing on others. As I said to a journalist this morning - this is one hell of a songwriter. I also suggested he take a look at my blog and the situation with Phil Spector.
All the best,
Kelley
Leonard Cohen Cross: Hidden in the volume of the emails there was tax information that was a request for tax information which Ms. Lynch already had. (RT 281) There were requests in those emails for tax information, correct? Yes Sir. (RT 281) What did you do since you got those emails to give those documents to Ms. Lynch? (RT 281) … Two courts had given me a default --- or one court had given me a default judgment; the other court affirmed the default judgment. But, more significantly, the IRS accepted the results of that default judgment and awarded me a tax refund, so Ms. Lynch had no cause to ask me for any taxation information. (RT 282) That is the forensic report that Ms. Lynch has been asking for. The only problem is she doesn’t like the results. (RT 282)
Date: Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Appeal
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Hello DOJ,
This is Cohen's testimony about the IRS refund. The IRS binder in Streeter's possession contains evidence that Cohen and his lawyers were concerned about the allegations brought to the IRS nearly a year after the refund was obtained. The IRS does not have a 1099 for me for the year 2004. I do not have one. The forensic ledger is fraudulent and the K-1s totally undermine them because they note that I had $0 income on LCI for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005. The IRS just advised me recently to call Cohen and ask him to rescind the illegal K-1s. And yet, the City Attorney is essentially arguing that I have my federal tax document. I do not have an accounting. There is a fraudulent ledger. An accounting takes corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, and equity into consideration. Who would LIKE an accounting that didn't? It's called theft. So, I will address the evidence - in the IRS binder - that was concealed. My declaration will address key issues and it will address how I view the prosecutor's lies to LAPD about me: as retaliation over my appeal and for requesting an investigation into this entirely insane matter. I have no idea what right the City Attorney has to even address tax matters and it is disturbing. I will also address other threats I've received when I have publicly noted that I intend to move legally against Leonard Cohen. It is outrageous and it is unconscionable. One must wonder about the conduct of the City Attorney's office. I don't have the tax documents; the K-1s are evidence of criminal conduct; the default judgment is fraudulent and based on perjury and willful concealment of corporate books and records; and this story just goes on and on. So, I'll address the key elements. This document takes things out of context. I don't think there was one hidden request for tax information in thousands of documents but the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB should review those documents to see what I addressed. These people lie.
I didn't know about the California order; thought the Boulder order expired; and the California order was fraudulently filed. Two lawyers have now confirmed that for me. I wasn't in a dating relationship with Cohen and the City Attorney doesn't seem to understand California case law regarding the definition of "dating relationship" so why bother continuing with absolute abject insanity?
Leonard Cohen is a man who cannot live in Canada because he has tax and residence problems there. He comes to this country and, from what I can tell, defrauds the U.S. government and uses perjury, fraud, lies, and concealment to blame his wrongdoing on others. As I said to a journalist this morning - this is one hell of a songwriter. I also suggested he take a look at my blog and the situation with Phil Spector.
All the best,
Kelley
Leonard Cohen Cross: Hidden in the volume of the emails there was tax information that was a request for tax information which Ms. Lynch already had. (RT 281) There were requests in those emails for tax information, correct? Yes Sir. (RT 281) What did you do since you got those emails to give those documents to Ms. Lynch? (RT 281) … Two courts had given me a default --- or one court had given me a default judgment; the other court affirmed the default judgment. But, more significantly, the IRS accepted the results of that default judgment and awarded me a tax refund, so Ms. Lynch had no cause to ask me for any taxation information. (RT 282) That is the forensic report that Ms. Lynch has been asking for. The only problem is she doesn’t like the results. (RT 282)