Francisco,
Sandra Jo Streeter - the prosecutor, Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, and
Michelle Rice all lied to the judge, jury, and elsewhere - and that
would include in Leonard Cohen's declaration in Boulder, Colorado and
in his declaration attached to the retaliatory lawsuit I was not
served in Los Angeles - where evidence was concealed from the judge
and Cohen took the position that he was the "beneficiary owner" of
Traditional Holdings, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.
Furthermore, this man publicly stated - to MacLean's (Canadian news
outlet) that he was not accusing me of "theft" and noted that his
motive was his "massive tax hit." He admitted committing perjury.
The objection was sustained and he should have been prosecuted.
Instead, Streeter tried to rehabilitate him and he blamed it on me
although I never testified about our non-existent "dating
relationship" or a "sexual relationship" which was merely presented to
the jurors as fact. There was a jury instruction re. lying and
instructing them to disregard the testimony of liars. Why did a juror
tell the public defenders who debriefed them that he felt sympathetic
(not a direct quote but the public defenders need to give us this
information and the precise statements of Agent Tejeda re. my future
hearings, trials, or sentencing - BEFORE the appeal is filed) that
Cohen or TH only had assets of $150,000. I have evidence - Robert
Kory asking my lawyers if TH will forgive Cohen's loans. That would
include his personal transaction fees that are not a corporate
expense. The interest, and Cohen knew this, is 6%. The loans were to
be repaid within 3 years and I asked his tax lawyer to prepare the
Promissory Notes. I do not and did not prepare legal documents. His
representatives did. He lied and said I was his "business manager."
Rich Feldstein could have testified. He was his business manager and
is a CPA. I handled NO accounting, financial, or tax/corporate
matters, whatsoever. I was Leonard Cohen's personal manager and
Steven Machat, and others, could have testified to that fact. Steven
was unavailable the week I was on trial. The trial should have been
delayed - for Steven Machat, Agent Tejeda/IRS, and Viramontes/LAPD -
who I had a right to confront over his report, etc. He was completely
and absolutely confused about the actual IRS matter which seems
bizarre. The lies are extensive and Streeter has no right to lie
about me, slander me, defame me, or harm my reputation. I was NOT in
a dating relationship with this man and there is no domestic violence.
With respect to the "car" statement, his grandchildren, etc. - he
testified that I have never come near him in 7 years. He testified
that I have NEVER stolen from him. Do you understand the implications
of that statement? That is precisely what he told MacLean's. The
Phil Spector statements - re. the other gun story - should be raised
because they prove there are inconsistencies in his statements and he
embellishes them. He testified that I have never vanadlized anything;
he never had to call the police in 20 years; etc. He testified that I
never directly threatened. I never indirectly threatened him either
and the Mikal Gilmore/Rolling Stone (brother's firing squad execution
and Cohen's desire to die by fire squad and smoke a last cigarette)
should be raised as an example. Horvath lied to the court and
concealed the full thread of the email text which sets for the satire.
My friend appointed me his liason to the Mossad and Iran. Do you
think I am that liason? No, this was a game we played. My friends
want to testify and could easily have.
What are the five emails Streeter presented to Sandra Baca - a woman
who DOES NOT know me. I did not sign the letters "Love, Kelley" and
who cares if I did. I was not on trial for creative writing or Bruce
Cutler re. his hearsay letter. This all affected sentencing and
Streeter's desire to have me comimtted and drugged and harm my
reputation with her acusations that I drink (I testified, facetiously
- if he said so and the sound, volume, and speed of the tapes were
tampered with and they cannot be date/time verified) and have mental
health issues.
Political retaliation is at issue and I testified that I believe
Cooley should be investigated. I have been vocal that I believe Phil
Spector is innocent, etc.
I have been exposed to dangerously unstable individuals - like Stephen
"Jihad" Gianelli. I contacted Viramontes/LAPD to ask him if he saw my
complaints to LAPD re. his outrageous and (from my perspective)
criminal conduct with respect to me and my children who were both
residents of LA. My younger son was a minor and I have no idea if
this man is a sexual predator, a member of NAMBLA (Streeter presented
that email to the jurors and Cohen began testifying about it and I
advised Nikhil that it related to Gianelli), or just dangerously
unstable. Investigator Frayeh felt he was a "shady character" who
probably found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me. He has
aligned himself with Leonard Cohen and has engaged in cyber-terrorism
(including attacking my blogs, emails, and having them taken down - so
I didn't attempt to evade Cutler and that hearsay statement is absurd)
with - among others, Michelle Blaine (who stole from Phil Spector and
had one of the most vile blogs I have ever seen and she appeared to
have motive); Kelly Green (an individual on the Darwin Exception's
Blog re., Phil Spector and Alan Jackson - it is a site that demonizes
Phil Spector and glorifies Jackson), an individual on Sprocket's Trial
& Tribulations Blog (I was told she's the mouthpiece for Clarkson and
she is affiliated with Blaine), Susanne Walsh (a die hard Cohen fan
who lives in Europe, evidently, which is convenient), and a handful of
others - on the internet, on articles posts, and who basically
descended on me whenever I posted anything positive about Phil Spector
or negative about Leonard Cohen. The D/A copy of the concealed email
thread highlights "Steven Machat' and bolsters my argument that there
is political retaliation here. Steven has publicly stated (our
conversation was posted online and someone had Scribd take down my
letter to Alan Jackson that was hand delivered by Investigator Frayeh
to Cooley and Jackson) that he does not believe Phil Spector shot
Clarkson. He has publicly stated that he intends to sue Cohen and
Kory - because Cohen stole from him and his father. He has, in our
published conversation, noted that Cohen stole from Phil Spector. His
name was highlighted and that is entirely sinister.
So, please give this some thought - when can you obtain an order,
default judgment, or verdict based on fraud, concealment, perjury, and
lies?
"Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer,
or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes
an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, [409 U.S.
352, 353] depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony,
declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true,
willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material
matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury, and
shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined not
more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This
section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made
within or without the United States."
Thank you.
All the best,
Kelley
|
