Evidence Willfully Concealed
|
| ||||||||||
NOTE: This evidently didn’t violate a restraining order. She and Kory have taken the position that sending or receiving federal tax documents, etc., violates a restraining order. This raises serious issues with Rice’s testimony (that’s perjury or fraud) and Kory’s letter to the IRS (IRS binder) stating that TH’s 1099 violated a restraining order. No one understands how a state order can trump IRS filing and reporting requirements – or how a court can force someone to use extraordinary means (such as a subpoena) to obtain tax, financial, and/or accounting data needed to file federal and state returns. I owe no money, had HUGE losses, my commission was addressed in 2001 (and then again, by my accountant, in 2003 who told me ALL taxes were paid, TH should be removed from my returns, and I had a carry-back and would have owed no taxes but paid $165,000 in 2003 – as Agent Bill Betzer/IRS knows for a fact). Has Jihad Gianelli, who appears to be commenting on my tax returns (and lying about my “intent to evade” with respect to my 1994 and 1995 returns – which were filed and all taxes paid), obtained a copy of my federal returns for 2001 or 2003 from the IRS? My lawyers advised me that Kory attempted to obtain copies of my returns from Ken Cleveland and, I believe, they said Cleveland refused to give them to Cohen/Kory.
Ms. Lynch:
While I do not desire at this juncture to engage in an extended back and
forth communication with you by e-mail or otherwise regarding legal issues
that have long since been resolved through several court cases from years
ago,
* **
I wasn’t part of Greenberg’s companion suit that appears to have been
coordinated with Cohen. The judge knows this. My limited involvement had
to do with inter-pleaded funds that I told the judge to send back to Cohen.
I view that as further evidence of theft with respect to Cohen. Nohing has
been legally resolved between me and Cohen. I wasn’t served his garbage
fraud lawsuit and the proof of service is fraudulent. I was unaware of
hearings; thought the default entered in March 2006 because of the press;
and it’s entirely criminal from what I can tell and an attempt to obstruct
justice. I only was able to read a handful of legal documents when Jihad
Gianelli (apparently representing Cohen) posted them on Scribd in April
2010. I intend to file a Motion to Vacate but I have been publicly
threatened over this which is a deadly serious legal matter. In fact, I
view it as BLACK MAIL, etc.*
since you have taken the time to compose a reply to my previous e-mail
NOTE: As of February 13, 2011 Michelle Rice is aware that there are outstanding legal issues – from my perspective, I am representing myself pro per, and this is in the court transcript in Boulder. So, the pro per issue is HUGE. LAPD’s report notes that Kory refused to speak to me. I contacted the State Bar (since my response to Cohen’s utterly fraudulent and pathetic Victim Impact Statement which must be addressed on appeal) and was advised that Kory and/or Rice HAD to speak to me. Judge Ken Freeman’s court reporter (when I contacted the judge re. information to file my Motion to Vacate Cohen’s fraudulent lawsuit in the spring of 2011; and Jihad Gianelli then contacted the court reporter and said she emailed him so this man does appear to attempt to infiltrate matters and his obsession with me – that I just raised with Streeter’s supervisor – is deranged and he appears to be dangerously unstable) asked if Cohen’s lawyers spoke to me about the mediation because they may have been videotaped, there should be transcripts, and I am entitled to them. Nikhil questioned Cohen or Kory on the mediations. This information has been concealed from me and my jurors and I have no idea what Cohen and Westin were discussing. I know this – Westin settled with Cohen and that appears to be some form of bribery and bought testimony. I have an email, which the IRS should have reviewed, from Westin advising me that TH is a real entity/structure and another advising me that HE did not represent me. That is correct. He did not. The IRS should have seen Cohen’s email to me telling me that HE decides when these entities are created, etc. He knows this – he wrote that and yet he has lied about these matters and concealed them (corporate books, records, notarized documents, non-revocable assignments, my Indemnity Agreement, Kory’s letter asking if his loans would be forgiven, etc.) from the courts, etc. One must wonder, as people have asked, if drugs permanently affected him and if his lawyers actually understand the law.
*What’s your point here, Rice? You can write and lie to my face, put words
in my mouth, misquote the court, and I shouldn’t reply? As I advised
Enichen, I am representing myself I have been legally advised that I may
communicate with so-called opposing counsel and request information I need
to amend/prepare my 2001-2010 tax returns. *
* *
, I will take this present opportunity to address the issues you raised in
your initial e-mail response. I note that since sending your first e-mail
reply, you have subsequently sent out more than two dozen e-mails, some
publicly impugning my integrity and calling me everything from a liar to a
thug.
NOTE: Streeter addressed Rice’s February 14, 2011 email but concealed this from my lawyers and the court, jurors, etc.
*That’s my personal opinion. I believe you are a liar and a thug. Nothing
on earth can ever change this. I also personally believe you are a criminal
who should be disbarred. The subsequent emails were sent to the IRS, FBI,
DOJ, Treasury, Mr. Riordan, Steven Machat, and the other people YOU COPIED
IN on your first communication to me of today. Remove Ron Burkle. Ron is a
friend of mine and he doesn’t know Cohen. I’ve advised him to bring legal
action against Cohen for having his lawyers copy Ron in on your preposterous
email to me. *
It was this very same type of menacing, threatening and uncivilized
behavior, along with most alarmingly, threats of physical violence towards
me, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Kory
NOTE: See the insane situation – presented at the bail hearing and in court (by Streeter) re. Jonathan Maihart. Rice said he was a Hispanic mail and gang member. I addressed this with her Supervisor, advised him that Maihart is Persian, and I spoke to Investigator Bennett/DA’s office about his increasing aggression (which as NOT a problem when he went to Kory’s as a messenger to pick up the letter he wrote in response to my lawyers telling me that Cohen and Kory had CNB freeze my bank accounts – based on slander, lies, and gossip – and my older son’s first bank account – causing Boies Schiller to note that this was a very very serious legal issue between me and CNB, obviously). Bennett advised me to call the Watch Commander at West LAPD regarding an incident and Wendy Knaak was present when I did. She also, I believe, spoke to Bennett. I wrote Congressman Henry Waxman around this time and raised Cohen/Kory’s threats about the restraining order (after this incident with Jonathan Maihart and Kory). Everything was documented at that time – including a demand to have the SWAT incident investigated because that was NOT a private legal matter and Mandeville Canyon was closed down, which was and remains absurd. Jonathan Maihart did NOT go to Kory/Rice’s office in 2007 or 2009. It was 2005. I was not in the hallway with Jonathan Maihart and that is preposterous. Kory never told Jonathan Maihart that he and Cohen were across the street in the park. He called Jonathan to apologize, thought it was my son, etc. So the lies are now excessive.
*Apart from saying that I think you should all be in prison (which I can’t
do in any event so see the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury) I have never
threatened physical violence, LIAR. Calling you a thug and liar is not a
physical threat idiot. I have never threatened any of you in any manner
that is alarming except that you clearly view the criminal tax fraud and
your conduct as criminal – to go to these lengths. I will call Ron Burkle
to the witness stand to testify as to whether or not he saw any evidence
that I threatened you, Kory, or Cohen in any manner – including with
physical violence. I will also subpoena Dennis Riordan. Is there a reaso
me? Hasn’t Cohen done enough damage to Phil Spector? I think his attorneys know.*
n
that you copied Phil Spector’s appellate attorney in on your emails to
* *
that prompted Mr. Cohen to first seek a restraining order against you in Los
Angeles Superior Court (LASC) as early as October 2005.
*That’s a lie. Cohen’s fraudulent retaliatory lawsuit and Lindsey’s
coordinated custody matter couldn’t back into a deal. Many people believe
that’s what all this activity was about. I have asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ,
Treasury, and Phil Spector’s legal team to investigate FULLY all fraudulent
TROs.*
Despite being prohibited by the LASC from continuing to harass Mr. Cohen,
you moved to Boulder, Colorado shortly thereafter - conveniently out of
reach of Los Angeles law enforcement - and continued your vicious harassment
long distance necessitating our seeking permanent redress from
your behavior in a
Colorado state court.
NOTE: Yongzin Rinpoche invited me to visit him and this had nothing to do with LAPD or Los Angeles law enforcement though I think people are talking to LAPD but that has to be discovered. In 2008, I had no matters involving LAPD and spoke to Investigator Thompson/DA’s office about the so-called warrants in Santa Monica. He advised me that until all of this unfolded, I rarely had a parking ticket. He advised me that only SMPD could arrest me over these warrants – and not LAPD. S&MPD told me the same thing. As of February 14, 2011, LASC has NOTHING whatsoever to do with any of this. Also, they had no jurisdiction over me and I have never been served the new California order registered on May 25, 2011. Redress from my behavior in a Colorado state court? The judge told me she would be distressed if she were me. Perhaps Rice doesn’t speak or write English – let’s try that again. My “vicious harassment long distance necessasiting our seeking permanent redress from your behavior in a Colorado state court.” Yes, Rice is referring to my behavior in a Colorado state court. I was well manner with the judge and she with me – although I disagreed with her position that this isn’t an IRS matter but I do think what actually led to the Boulder “redress” was Ann Diamond’s draft article for Rolling Stone.
*I represent myself and I am entitled to request information I need
(including a complete forensic accounting) to prepare and/or amend my 2001
to 2010 tax returns. Boulder MUNICIPAL Court and LA Superior Court have NO
JURISIDICTION over a federal tax return. I visited friends of mine in
Colorado, liar. Stop lying about me. I could care less about Los Angeles
law enforcement. What did they want with me? Are you now lying about Los
Angeles law enforcement? There’s some fraud sinister misdemeanor tickests
in Santa Monica. That’s not Los Angeles. I didn’t continuye vicious
harassment. The IRS, DOJ, Treasury, and Doron Weinberg were copied in on
all my emails to anyone regarding Cohen, Kory, et al., with respect to
information I needed, etc. That’s why Mr. Weinberg will receive an
subpoena. You may have sought permanent redress but you didn’t receive it.
You didn’t present evidence or witnesses to the court. I asked that she
make the order permanent and asked if it would protect me. This is a very
serious legal matter that I intend to litigate. *
* *
That you now deny that Judge Enichen had personal jurisdiction over you or
the issues that were raised in that proceeding is utterly ridiculous given
the fact that you personally appeared in court before the judge and signed
the restraining order and assented to its terms in open court before many
witnesses.
*I don’t now deny it, LIAR. I filed a Motion to Quash and advised the court
that I read through the file, the perjury and fraud was excessive and
unreal, and informed the court that the proof of service was fraudulent. She
reminded me that I – not Cohen – asked tht the fraud TRO become
semi-permanent. Why? Because I’m litigating this. It’s now a federal
matter because when Cohen filed his garbage fraud TRO (without the judge
ruling that he proved anything) in California – it crossed state lilness. I
assented to nothing and stop speaking for me or telling me what I did or
didn’t do. You’re a bald faced liar with obvious motive. That’s my
personal opinion.*
NOTE: At this point, my lawyers could have PROVEN that I personally believed the Boulder order was SEMI-PERMANENT. Berkeley PD can bolster that argument because I had NO IDEA that there was a restraining order and was also shocked that LASC could possibly have jurisdiction over me. I then raised Boulder as a far-fetched possibility and, during processing at the jail, the warden told me that it was “Boulder.” The Denver FBI advised me that this activity was crossing state lines and that is true understatement. It’s even international since Cohen was out of the country at many points in 2009, 2011, etc.
While I do not represent you and what follows should not be in any way
construed as offering any kind of legal advice - I assume you have consulted
your own independent legal counsel and discussed these issues at length.
What follows is my response to the issues you have raised.
*You are damn right when you say you don’t represent me. Don’t speak for
me. Don’t speculate about what I think or said. You will know whether or
not I have consulted legal counsel when you hear from them. In the
meantime, I am representing myself.*
First of all, let's assume, arguendo, that you are representing yourself and
desire now to be cognizant of and abide by federal law, California state law
and the State Bar rules governing the conduct of attorneys and counsel:
*Why assume “arguendo?” Why get fancy? I told the judge and I just told you – I
am representing myself. I’m not desirous now of being cognizant of federal,
state and bar rules governing pro per individuals. I know my rights and I
personally spoke to the State Bar about this and have received legal counsel
on the issue. *
1. Mr. Cohen is a represented party and has legal representation. As such,
even if there were no permanent Restraining Order in place which prohibited
you from contacting Mr. Cohen directly, which there clearly is - he is a
'represented party' and the California State Bar rules prohibit the knowing
direct contact of a represented party.
NOTE: LAPD’s report states that Kory refuses to speak to me so I wonder where Rice
will go with this logic? I am not a member of the California State Bar. Rice overlooked
this extremely relevant fact.
*Rice, where’s the forensic accounting that takes into consideration all
non-revocable assignments. Perhps if you or Kory spoke to me, I wouldn’t
have to go to extraordinary lengths to request information I need to prepare
and/or amend my 2001 through 2010 tax returns. Illegal K1s were transmitted
to the IRS from LC Investments, LLC. Cohen, in his declaration, declared
that he is the 100% owner. I want them rescinded. Cohen was not the
beneficial owner of TH or BMT. The judge had no jurisdiction. I’m not a
member of the state bar, Rice. You are and I think you should be disbarred.
Why would State Bar rules apply to a non-member? Any thoughts on that? There
is no TRO and furthermore they are all evidence of fraud and the
extraordinary lengths Cohen has gone to silence and terrorize me, my family,
and others.*
NOTE: I raise the extraordinary lengths I am being forced to go to obtain information for my tax returns – including to amend those wrongfully altered by Cohen’s default judgment that I wasn’t notified of when homeless. Rice acknowledges that she is opposing counsel but refuses to answer my questions – see above.
Therefore, as so-called "opposing counsel", please cease and desist
contacting Mr. Cohen directly. Thank you for providing another, yet
independent legal reason in addition to the Permanent Order of Protection
issued by the Colorado court for you to cease and desist your harassment of
Mr. Cohen.
*Are you insulting my intelligence, Rice. Don’t make me laugh. I was
Cohen’s personal manager, publishing administrator, publicist, book
publishing agent, artwork representative (I made the lithograph deal), and
worked as part of his team – most of whom were concealed from LA Superior
Court in Cohen’s fraud garbage retaliatory suit filed after I reported his
tax fraud to the IRS. I was told the tax fraud is criminal. Dale Burgess
advised me to let the IRS and Treasury know, after I met with Agent Sopko
and her partner, that he would he recalled Cohen’s offer of 50% community
property Other witnesses were present for that offer – and other offers. He
also asked me to let them know that my lawyers understood that the tax fraud
was criminal. I have no idea why he asked me to tell the IRS and Treasury
that. *
* *
*I m not harassing Leonard Cohen. Is Leonard Cohen now an absolutely
deranged sadist? The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Mr. Riordan are copied in
on all my emails so it might be wise not to lie which you are repeatedly
throughout these emails. They know what I’ve been requesting. They know it
relates to preparing and/or amending my 2001-2010 federal tax returns some
of which Cohen illegally altered via a default judgment in a matter I wasn’t
served.*
2. As for the prohibition from contacting me or Mr. Kory currently to
request information regarding Mr. Cohen: this issue was specifically
discussed in the restraining order proceedings before Judge Enichen in
Colorado
NOTE: Bald faced lie. Rice appears nowhere on the order and the order
Only extended to the physical address on the order.
*Enichen does not have jurisdiction over my federal tax returns. I was
given legal advice that I am permitted to contact Cohen or his
representatives for information I need to amend and/or file my 2001 through
2010 tax returns. How could Enichen prevent me from filing my tax returns
properly? She’s not a federal judge and Boulder Municipal Court is not tax
court. Rice, I didn’t see you in the fraud TRO issue that I asked the judge
to make somewhat permanent after asking her if it would protect me. There
was no hearing. Cohen presented no evidence. No witnesses took the stand
to support Cohen’s garbage declaration that I addressed in my Motion to
Quash. Therefore, the judge didn’t rule for Cohen. Why don’t you give
that some thought since you view yourself as real intelligent so-called
opposing counsel.*
* *
and I will happily provide a transcript of those proceedings to refresh
your memory regarding the rationale behind the Court's order prohibiting you
from contacting our law office regarding Mr. Cohen.
*Send me the transcript. I know the court’s rationale. I asked her to make
the fraud TRO relatively permanent. I intend to the litigate the
matter. There
was no hearing and she didn’t rule in Cohen’s favor.*
* *
The reason the Order of Protection includes a no-contact Order protecting
our office
*Protecting your office? Are you people on drugs. Cohen stole from me; you
helped him destroy my life; Cohen and Kory targeted Rutger and Ray; Rutger
was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my former house to Cohen on May
25, 2005. You people are out of your minds. *
NOTE: Did Streeter intentionally, knowingly, and willfully conceal this from my jurors
or did Michelle Rice?
(please see Paragraph 2 of the Order) is because there are no current legal
proceedings open between you and Mr. Cohen and as such
*Yes there is. I intend to file a Motion to Vacate Cohen’s fraud garbage in
Los Angeles. Fraud, as you well know, tolls the statutes. I only
discovered the fraud in Cohen’s complaint, declaration, Prins’ declaration,
the default judgment, and the proof of service in April 2010. Fraud has a
four year statute and I don’t know the extent of the fraud and you keep
threatening me with arrest. That’s an outrage and should be criminal.*
* *
, you have no right to randomly and repeatedly contact our office and demand
information and continue your harassment, even if you are as you say
"representing yourself."
*I have advised you what I am requesting and the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury,
and Mr. Riordan have been copied in on every email. I am representing
myself. Why do you keep repeating this? I am not harassing you. Had you or
Kory simply responded, I would never have contacted you again. Your
argument is absurd and preposterous.*
* *
Any lawyer advising you otherwise must not have had full information or the
history of the operative facts or knowledge of the Colorado Court's Order
*The “operative facts?” Do you think you’re in the CIA, Rice, with Cohen’s
informant who was apparently Julie Eisenberg. Last Superfon (who does NOT
speak for me to anyone) heard – Julie Eisenberg assaulted her maid; stole
her jewelry; stole a file; and stole her dog. She then evidently went to
Vegas to become a stripper. I’ve seen her on drugs. She can’t write an
address on a package. I heard she was jealous of me – from Superfon.*
* *
*What if the lawyer I consulted did have the full information and history of
the facts or knowledge of the Colorado Court’s so-called order – which he
did? He was shocked that a judge would issue anything to Cohen against me
based on the facts. *
* *
upon
which to base their
advice. Even if there were open unresolved legal proceedings between you
and Mr. Cohen, which there are none,
*Don’t speak for me, Rice. There are legal issues and future proceedings
between me and Cohen. PERIOD.*
* *
there is an orderly process by which to obtain information from an opposing
party during the course of litigation proceedings.
*Don’t mix apples and oranges. I have requested information for my tax
returns. That is not subject, right now, to court. I see you don’t want
to hand over the information. Why? What re you concealing? How about all
the non-revocable assignments, related to my 15% share, of all intellectual
property. Kory already confirmed for my representatives (and there is
evidence backing it up in any event – see corporate books, records, stock
certificates, etc.) that my commission was 15% (and Cohen agreed we would do
an accounting after the deal we received an offer from Sony/ATV for on
October 21, 2004), which went back to 1988, and confirmed my 15% ownership
in the intellectual property.*
NOTE: This was concealed from my jurors.
For the record, you chose not to avail yourself of these orderly processes
during the course of litigation proceedings which were instituted to resolve
the legal controversies between you and Mr. Cohen nearly five years ago.
*You’re lying again, Rice. I wasn’t served the lawsuit. The proof of
service is fraudulent. No such individual lived at my house. It’s evidence
of fraud. I wasn’t aware of hearings, etc. I ended up homeless in December
2005. You could have emailed me the documents. *
NOTE: Why did Streeter enter the default judgment and question me on it?
It does NOT go to character. It proves I was homeless and the notice was sent
to my former home in Brentwood. Cohen’s declaration, in Boulder, makes it
clear that he knew I was in Santa Monica and I was told – by Superfon – that
Cohen/Kory contacted S&MPD which might explain why they told me they
understood I was friends with Phil Spector.
*Where did they go? Cohen himself noted in his Boulder declaration that he
knew I was homeless in Santa Monica. The legal controversy was retaliation
for my reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS. Period. After it was filed,
Cohen told Brian Johnson that he wasn’t accusing me of theft (which would be
bald-faced lie) and noted that his motive for going after me was his massive
tax hit. He even noted that Westin represented him until April 2005. The
IRS was given the passwords to my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com email
accounts and in those accounts are emails from Richard Westin advising me
that he didn’t represent me. That’s true understatement. No one
representing me would put my life in danger like this. *
* *
You were never denied access to any information during the course of any
litigation between you and Mr. Cohen. You simply chose not to respond to
any of Mr. Cohen's allegations against you. You now rather disingenuously
intend to imply that somehow there was some withholding or concealment of
information from you during the course of litigation, which is a blatant
untruth.
*I was denied access. Have you ever heard of due process? Why don’t you
send me all the settlement transcripts with Westin? I was denied full
knowledge of all proceedings and actual facts (or lies) contained in the
Complaint because I never saw it. EVER. I am saying Cohen’s lawsuit is a
cover up of criminal tax fraud. That’s my view. You are lying when you say
anything about what I am implying. Nothing I am saying is
disingenuous. Interesting
word, Rice. Calling me a liar? Should I view that as a threat of violence.
Your threat with respect to my so-called arrest is an absolute threat of
violence – also possible wrongful imprisonment, etc. A blatant
untruth? Calling
me a liar again? Another threat of violence – per your definition. Do not
speak for me. I haven’t implied anything. I have stated everything in my
emails. Nothing needs to be implied.*
3. As for your current belated requests of our office to provide tax
returns, business records and a "forensic accounting" for Mr. Cohen's
business entities
NOTE: Rice admits that I am currently requesting their office to provide
information. I never asked for tax returns. I did ask for a “forensic account”
but BMT and TH are NOT Cohen’s business entities. LCI is and there are
illegal K1s (evidence of criminal conduct) that were transmitted to the State of
Kentucky in 2003 and the IRS in 2004 and 2005 noting that my income was $0.
Kentucky in 2003 and the IRS in 2004 and 2005 noting that my income was $0.
The Kentucky K1 notes that I am the 99.5% owner of TH and there is a K1 for Cohen
and a transmittal letter so that’s no mistake. The fraudulent expense ledger, however,
notes income from LCI – HENCE my repeated requests that it be rescinded and
an accounting provided.
*I reiterate all my requests for this information.*
* *
- you had ample opportunity in the lawsuit Mr. Cohen brought against you in
August 2005 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Civil Case Number BC 338322 to
request any information of Mr. Cohen that was pertinent to the issues you
now belatedly raise many years later.
*Rice, see if you can get this: I wasn’t served Cohen’s lawsuit. The proof
of service is fraudulent. I didn’t read the complaint until Jihad Gianelli
filed it online in April 2010. The fraudulent lawsuit has nothing to do
with my federal tax returns and to say that a State Court has anything to do
with federal tax returns is ludicrous and a bald-faced lie. The State
Court, however, did alter my federal tax returns via a default judgment in a
matter I wasn’t served. How could a state court alter federal tax returns?
Would you like to answer that question. Belated. *
* *
As you are well aware, since you chose not to exercise your legal rights
*Addressed ad nauseum. I have a legal right to the information I’ve
requested relating to my 2001-2010 federal tax returns and I have a legal
right to be served and to due process of law. *
* *
at the time of the lawsuit and failed to respond at all to the complaint
*Rice, you’re not paying attention: I wasn’t served the lawsuit and didn’t
see the Complaint until Jihad Gianelli posted it online in April 2010. To
say I saw anything when I was homeless in 2006 is preposterous. It’s a
bald-faced lie. Stop lying about me: I didn’t FAIL to respoind top the
complaint. I never received the complaint.*
NOTE: I had Chad Knaak phone Scott Edelman to advise him that I wasn’t
served this lawsuit and to serve me. I spoke with Kory and advised him I wasn’t
served. He advised me to contact CNB because they were providing Cohen with
my bank statements. I have advised Cohen NOT to destroy them. That is spoliation
and I will sue over that issue. I adised Doug Davis/FTB that Cohen is in receipt
of my bank statements.
* *
, much less engage in an orderly discovery process
*How about illegal discovery which is what I personally think took place in
a variety of ways. The State Court has nothing to do with federal tax
returns or information I need for my 2001-2010 federal tax returns. Call
Ken Freeman up personally and ask him how he would have jurisdiction over
federal tax returns. There is no default judgment, Rice. And, a default
judgment cannot alter my federal tax returns in a state court. Furthermore,
two entities weren’t named in the lawsuit and can’t just sneak parties into
a default judgment. Furthermore, it’s all fraud. See all corporate books,
records, stock certificates, notarized documents, and the
Indemnity Agreement. *
NOTE: Rice forgot to research obtaining judgments, orders, and verdicts
through fraud which is something I just raised with Streeter’s supervisor.
* *
to obtain the information you now seek, the Los Angeles Superior Court
entered a default judgment against you in May 2006. The legal issues you
now attempt to raise - nearly five years after a Los Angeles Superior Court
has entered judgment against you on these very same issues - are fully
precluded from being raised again in a court of law by,
among others,
the doctrines of statutes of limitations, laches and res judicata.
NOTE: NOT when procured by fraud and the judgments are void. This is
well established law and the courts have continually weighed in on this and
the fact that orders can be vacated – including in criminal matters.
*Call Jihad Gianelli and discuss laches and res judicata until the cows come
home, ok? I’m filing suit in federal court, Rice. I’m filing a Motion to
Vacate. Fraud tolls the statutes. L Superior Court couldn’t have entered a
default judgment in matter I wasn’t served where the proof of service is
fraudulent.*
NOTE: I wonder why Judge Ken Freeman’s court reporter understood that I
Was filing a Motion to Vacate, asked me if opposing counsel gave me the transcripts
to the mediations, raised the two default judgment rule, and we discussed the fact
that I was not served, the proof of service is fraudulent, and wasn’t notified of the
Default. She advised me that I had to be notified of the default and then referred me to
a second matter which I had no idea about. This evidently relates to the illegal search
of my house and the seizure of my partnership documents. LASD noted, on the document
I have, that they seized partnership documents. Boies Schiller advised me that this seizure
was illegal. Raoul Felder advised me that he felt it was probably illegal but cautioned me to be
careful but the Sheriff’s Department could arrest me which is an OUTRAGE.
As there are no open litigation matters between you and Mr. Cohen, you have
no legitimate reason to continue to contact our law office or Mr. Cohen. Any
continued attempt to contact our office or Mr. Cohen is a continued
violation of the Permanent Restraining Order. As such, I have no obligation
to continue to communicate with you, nor contrary to your assertion, do I or
Mr. Kory have any obligation to respond to your demands for information.
*I have made you perfectly clear re. what I am requesting with respect to
information I need to amend/file my 2001-2010 tax returns. Let me see if I
get this – you can violate the TRO by contacting me. You can be copied in
on emails to my minor son (which I think is witness tampering and
intimidation) and then you can just set the terms at whim. I have a reason
to respond. I am addressing what you just put in writing to me. I am
asking Leonard Cohen for this information. You represent him. I disagree.
I think he has an obligation to give me the information I’ve requested with
respect to my federal tax returns. I’ve asked the IRS Commissioner’s Staff
for an opinion on this matter. I’ve also asked them to give me an opinion
on the Boulder matter, jurisdiction there based on emais sent that they were
copied in on, and on the entire LA Superior Court matter and Greenberg’s
matter. I’ve also asked them if Freeman had jurisdiction or authority to
amend my federal tax returns or wrongfully convert my property to Cohen via
a default judgment.*
NOTE: This letter is evidence of legitimate business reason for contacting Kory,
Rice, and Cohen AND addresses the fact that I have been forced to go to unbelievable
Extremes (and endure great frustration) to obtain the information I am requesting, to
Address legal issues with opposing counsel (re. lack of service with respect to Cohen’s
Fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit against me, my requests for tax information – a 1099
For my personal management commissions was not addressed in Cohen’s retaliatory lawsuit but Rice does LIE.
Once again, I ask that carefully reread the terms of the permanent
Protective Order and carefully consider the consequences of your further
actions.
*Do you see the FBI copied in on my emails? I have heard from the FBI. I’ve
spoken with many FBI agents. I have received emails from the FBI. I think
they should view these communications from you and your threats to have me
arrested as wire fraud that relates to Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is
criminal. I would assume that the FBI knows for a fact that I didn’t
threaten you with physical violence. I’ll let them speak for themselves. *
NOTE: I don’t speak for the IRS, FBI, or anyone else. I speak for myself.
Cohen, Kory, Rice, Streeter, Gianelli, Kelly Green, Susanne Walsh, and others
Speak for the IRS and FBI and I believe that is criminal misrepresentation, etc.
* *
*You, Cohen, Kory, and others, have been advised to CEASE AND DESIST – stop
slandering me. Stop lying about me. Stop slandering my parents, my sister
and her husband (whose attorney is copied in on this email), and advise all
parties who have attempted to witness tamper, witness intimidate, etc. re.
Cohen’s matter (and Phil Spector’s) to cease and desist. That includes, but
is not limited to, Jihad Gianelli, Susanne Walsh, Kelly Green, Linda Motley,
and that pure trash crowd. Apparently Steven Machat’s business colleague
received abusive emails (relating to Cohen) from a madwoman in Canada. Seems
like a pattern to me. *
* *
*These are all my opinions. Nothing is implied. Everything is stated
herein. You do not speak for me. Nothing about you, from my perspective,
is sincere, Rice.*
* *
*Kelley Lynch*
Sincerely,
Michelle L. Rice, Esq.
Kory & Rice LLP
9300 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 285-1633
Fax: (310) 278-7641
NOTICE: This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this email in
error, please destroy this message immediately along with all attachments,
if any, and please report the receipt of this message to the sender at the
address listed above. Thank you for your cooperation.
NOTE: And the February 14, 2011 earlier email was not privileged? This
Email was concealed and it addresses Stephen “Jihad” Gianelli.