Saturday, June 4, 2016

Leonard Cohen's Desperate, Deranged Operative & A Totally Out Of Control Justice System


  2. Kelley: Stephen Gianelli is bombarding me with the news that your case was dismissed and insisting I post it in the interests of fairness. Specifically this link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/313156039/Order-Dismissing-Kelley-Lynch-s-Federal-Case-Against-Leonard-Cohen-as-Frivolous-Judge-Stephen-v-Wilson-Case-n0-Cv16-2771svw
    He seems to think it proves something, based presumably on the premise that the US judiciary system is, of course, 100% fair and honest, and no judge ever bowed to pressure from on high. I think he has a faulty idea of my readership (as being made up of the born-yesterdays), but anyway.
  3. Jasun,
    A single email (and two increasingly succinct attempted but unapproved comments) hardly constitutes “bombardment”. As to what the opinions of a federal magistrate judge, then adopted by a federal judge “prove”? When read in conjunction with the orders of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2014 and 2015, the federal tax court in 2015, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016 what is proven is EITHER every federal and state court in California is a part of some sinister over-arching conspiracy OR Kelley Lynch’s claims really are “frivolous”. Those who believe that the phone company shot JFK and that the moon landing was faked, will probably chose to believe the former. But people should be free to make up their own minds. Thank you, and forgive the “bombardment”.
  4. Hi Jasun,
    I filed a federal RICO (racketeering) lawsuit against Leonard Cohen and the federal court had the audacity to advise me that criminal conduct is protected activity. That speaks volumes about their justice system and nothing about me. Gianelli is bombarding everyone. He is Leonard Cohen’s agent and definitely appears to be moonlighting for the Phil Spector prosecutors. Who knows what these judges are doing. From my perspective, they are engaged in criminal conduct that involves condoning fraud, perjury, theft, extortion, money laundering, embezzlement, and so forth. On top of all of this, they want to be glorified. Stephen Gianelli terrorized my sons for seven straight years and is a blatant criminal and precisely the type of dangerous clown, as Ann Diamond concluded, that Cohen uses as a proxy. Tax Court and our 9th Circuit federal court also view fraud, perjury, etc. as patently frivolous. Ask yourself this question: why do they have jobs? What does JFK or the moon landing have to do with a court system that condones criminal conduct? Maybe the taxpayers should ponder that question.
    Kelley
Speaking of JFK and the Moon Landing, why does Leonard Cohen have the right to argue that he was a participant in CIA’s MK Ultra Program, CIA Recon during Bay of Pigs, an individual in advance possession of information re. Yom Kippur War, etc. but everyone else that speaks the truth is a Moon Landing conspiracy theorist? JFK was obviously assassinated so that is not a conspiracy. Perhaps Cohen would like to discuss his “fantasies” about men that hold guns on him in Cuba if he wants to discuss conspiracy theories.
https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2015/09/16/straw-sage-the-shtickless-shtick-perception-management-of-leonard-cohen/
at

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Kelley Lynch Email to the Appellate Division & Leonard Cohen's Appellate Attorney Wendy Lascher

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: WCL CL <wlascher@fcoplaw.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>


Wendy Lascher,

I have contacted the Appellate Division re. your refusal to designate one law firm re. service of the appeal brief and so forth.  I'm certain you have some interesting rationale particularly given the fact that your client failed to serve me the summons and complaint in Case No. BC338322, used a fraud default as an opportunity to steal from me, and fraudulently registered a Colorado NON-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER issued without findings as a DMV order in Cali without notifying me of the newly created order.  As I've stated, I will now address all of this - including the fraudulently obtained federal tax refunds - directly with the Senate Judiciary.  That will also include the fraud DMV order, VAWA funding fraud, and extortion with respect to both my sentencing and the outrageous attempts on LA Superior Court's part to extort fines/fees from me re. DMV.  Exposing one's penis to a female colleague, looking at people defecating on one another, etc. is not by any stretch of the imagination a "dating relationship."


Kelley Lynch


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:19 PM
Subject:
To: "Guzman, Jim"

Jim,

How are you?  I have a question for you.  Leonard Cohen's new appellate lawyer has filed an association of attorney.  I will be pursuing my appeals and, while they did not designate, what actual appeals they are referring to (electing, in the alternative, to simply provide the trial court case numbers), they would like two separate law firms served.  I think one law firm is acceptable and am not in a financial position to serve both law firms due to the situation that is actually being appealed on all fronts.  I would like to file a motion about this matter.  While I asked attorney Wendy Lascher, as a courtesy, if she would be willing to designate one firm, she refused to do so and doubled down. I personally find the conduct of all lawyers involved in this situation unconscionable and perverse.  My question is this:  may I file the motion electronically with you?

Thank you.

All the best,
Kelley Lynch
at