River Deep Blog: 1/10/16

Saturday, January 16, 2016

Leonard Cohen's Use of Fraud, Perjury & Litigation Misconduct Has LA Superior Court's Stamp of Approval

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:28 AM
Subject: Fwd: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen Is Entitled to Steal, Lie, Cheat, Slander, Retaliate, Etc.
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Alan Hootnick,

What is your involvement with Leonard Cohen's fraudulent default judgment, theft, slander, insurance fraud, embezzlement, tax fraud, etc? I understand that you are a supporter of Phil Spector's but I do not understand why this criminal is harassing me with you copied in. Robert Kory and Michelle Rice are Cohen's attorneys of record. There are presently four appeals before the Appellate Division here. The Tax Court matter will be appealed to the 9th Circuit. I am filing a RICO suit. It would be hard for Cohen's operative to argue anything since I haven't filed the lawsuit. He is clearly attempting to elicit information. Cohen is confident that he can perjure himself, commit theft and embezzlement, fraudulently accuse me of many matters - including when he obtained fraudulent tax refunds (six months before the fraud default was entered), and do whatever he wants. After all, he willfully bankrupted me, destroyed my reputation, and then stole from me via a fraud default judgment. He wanted to be able to argue claims preclusion and willfully failing to serve me is one of his tactics.

I will be addressing the Tax Court case directly with the 9th Circuit.

I didn't file a second motion to vacate Cohen's fraud default judgment. I filed a motion addressing egregious fraud upon the court. The court mischaracterized my motion as one of Cali's catch-all motions to reconsider. Cohen's lawyers didn't file a signed order after obtaining the denial of my motion to vacate based on their further fraudulent misrepresentations and perjured testimony/statements. I am now clear that LA Superior Court condones the use of fraud, perjury, and litigation misconduct to obtain judgments, verdicts, and orders. They also fraudulently assign "dating relationships" in secret.

Do you have any questions for me?

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:15 AM
Subject: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen Is Entitled to Steal, Lie, Cheat, Slander, Retaliate, Etc.
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.mx/2016/01/leonard-cohen-is-entitled-to-steal-lie.html?m=1

Ms. Lynch,

You write, in part:

"I don't believe all legal actions I am contemplating against Cohen are foreclosed." 

Unfortunately (for you) your belief is not grounded  on specific legal ‎authority consisting of a statute that you can cite by section number or on-point case law that you can cite by case name, reporter volume and page number. 

It is also unfortunate (for you) that you either lack the capacity I or refuse to - consider the statute and case citations that I have provided you with that establish to a legal certainty ‎that your threatened lawsuit against Cohen and others is barredd by the RICO statute of limitations, res judicata, the Rooker Feldman Doctrine, the litigation privledge, and other well established legal principles. 

This is unsurprising.  

You refused to believe (for example) that the lack of a notice of determination expressly addressed by the IRS to "Kelley Lynch"‎ deprived the tax court of jurisdiction to even consider your July, 2015 petition. To this day you refuse to accept this unambigious legal truth - even after the tax court dismissed your case on that very basis on December 29, 2015. 

As for your second motion before judge Hess‎, in law and motion practice is is not the title of the motion or the characterization of the motion by the party filing it that governs how the law treats it. Rather it  is the ORDER which is requested in the motion that governs. 

In June of 2015 Judge Hess denied the SECOND motion  that you filed ‎requesting orders vacating Cohen's May, 2006 judgment and dismissing the case, OR, in the alternative, giving you leave to file an answer to Cohen's 2005 complaint. 

You filed an INITIAL motion requesting those identical ‎order in 2013 and the motion was denied in January of 2014. 

Therefore, from a legal standpoint you did in fact file two motions to vacate, both of which were denied. 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.‎

Leonard Cohen's Insurance Fraud

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Insurance Fraud: California Insurance Code Section 1871.7(b)
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Michelle Rice, Robert Kory, and Scott Edelman,

Not too long ago, my Criminal Stalker (Gianelli) sent me evidence that Cohen and his representatives engaged in insurance fraud with respect to Richard Westin and Lloyd's of London. Insurance Code Section 1871.7(b) permits a civil suit related to insurance fraud. This suit will be filed after my RICO suit is filed within the next few weeks against Cohen, et al. Please maintain all evidence related to the Westin Insurance Fraud matter. It appears that the settlement was based on false accusations about me. I personally think that all parties should stop lying.

Kelley Lynch

Insurance Code Section 1871(b) creates liability for a civil penalty and assessment based upon the presentation of a fraudulent claim when such presentation violates section 550.5 Consequently, it is apparent subdivision (e) which authorizes “bring[ing] a civil action for violation of this section ” authorizes an action based upon the theory a defendant violated either subdivision (a) or subdivision (b). (Italics added.) In other words, the Legislature intended to give private parties the right to sue based upon any act stated in subdivisions (a) and (b) that could subject a defendant to civil penalties and damages.

Leonard Cohen Is Entitled to Steal, Lie, Cheat, Slander, Retaliate, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:53 AM
Subject: Fwd: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Kelley Lynch's Emails to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers & Alan Hootnick Re: the Ongoing Criminal Harassment
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Alan Hootnick,

The Criminal Stalker copies you because it "pleases" him. Then let's take a look at what Cohen's operative has to say.

I am about to file a federal lawsuit. Therefore, a federal judge - not Cohen or his representatives - will decide the issues.

I wasn't served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit. He has merely proven that if you fail to serve someone, lie extensively, and align yourself with the DA and City Attorney, you can prevail.

I didn't file a second motion to vacate. I filed a motion addressing egregious fraud upon the court. It's quite clear to me that LA Superior Court condones the use of fraud, perjury, and litigation misconduct to obtain verdicts, judgments, and orders. That includes Cohen's fraudulent "domestic violence" order. LA Superior Court, without notifying me, simply assigned me a secret "dating relationship" with Leonard Cohen.

My sons are men and my younger son was harassed by this criminal, with Cohen's lawyer copied in, when he was a minor. I was targeted over that issue during my so-called trial. The Criminal Stalker doesn't know my sister. He harassed her for years even after her lawyer advised him to cease and desist. Steve Lindsey is positively evil. He has now destroyed two of his children's lives. That's his habit.

Why is there a corporate co-plaintiff in Cohen's fraud default judgment matter? That corporation, like Cohen, does not own assets that generate the royalty income. The judgment is evidence of theft, self-dealing, embezzlement, co-mingling, and money laundering.

I don't believe all legal actions I am contemplating against Cohen are foreclosed.

I am now forced to sue Leonard Cohen for the IRS required tax and corporate information. He can have his fraud restraining orders because no one on this end is interested in seeing him.

The Stalker's incredibly aggressive and fixated. How extensive do you believe his relationship with Spector's prosecution team is? Cohen was aligned with the former DA who prosecuted Phillip. Did Cohen get away with lying about Phil Spector? He now has three versions of his bullshit gun story before LA Superior Court. Leonard Cohen believes in this motto evidently: I got away with it and I'm entitled to steal, lie, cheat, slander, etc. As his friend, Irving Layton concluded, "Leonard Cohen is a narcissist who hates himself." He hates others as well. He's entirely vindictive and vengeful.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 4:02 AMSubject: Re: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Kelley Lynch's Emails to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers & Alan Hootnick Re: the Ongoing Criminal HarassmentTo: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Ms. Lynch,

You need to face the reality of your situation. Once you do that, everyone - including you will be better off. Your petty insults are simply a way for you to avoid reality. I won't play that.

HERE ARE SOME FACTS OF LIFE:

1. It is now January of 2016 - 9-months shy of the 12-year anniversary of the end of your business relationship with Leonard Cohen and WAY BEYOND any reasonable time to initiate a lawsuit of any kind that arises out of that relationship.

2. Your default was entered in Leonard Cohen's civil suit against you in 2005. A delay of MONTHS in filing a motion to set that judgment aside would normally be fatal to the motion. Due diligence in coming forward is required. A $7M default judgment was entered in May of 2006. You waited until June of 2013 to move to set that default and default judgment aside, and that motion was denied in 2014. You never took steps to appeal that order.

3. Your second motion asking the court to set aside the $7M default judgment was made and denied in June of 2015. In the meantime, that default judgment as grown to $14M with unpaid legal interest, and had been renewed through 2026.

4. You are no longer in your 30's or even your 40's. You are 58 years old.

5. Your sons are no longer children. They are grown men who have moved on with their lives. Your ex-husbands, Steve Lindsey, and your sister have moved on with their lives.

6. You have been threatening to sue just about everyone since 2004, but have in fact sued NOBODY. As far as suing Cohen, the 2006 judgment, the passage of time, and various legal privileges stand in your way. Attacking the judgment in federal court is additionally precluded by the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine.

7. Leonard Cohen has a $14M lien against everything you own and ever will own. There is a corporate co-plaintiff, and therefore the judgment lien (which is now growing by $1.4M every year) will survive Cohen's death.

8. Any legal action you may have contemplated relating to your former business relationship with Cohen, claimed intellectual property, or your 2012 arrest is now foreclosed for multiple, insurmountable reasons. Any federal court suit would be quickly dismissed, as your tax court suit was.

9. If you want to continue screaming and yelling on the blogs and in emails - fine. But that is ALL you can do to anyone, short of breaking the law and/or violating the Colorado order and going back to jail. But your blog posts and emails are not changing anyone's mind.

It's over.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to Captain Mark Bornman, Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Re. the Threats Over Her Proposed Book Publishing Advance

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Captain Mark Bornman (LASD), "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>

Hello Captain Bornman,

How are you? I would like you and LASD to review the following harassing email from Leonard Cohen's operative, Stephen Gianelli, who also appears to be moonlighting for the Spector prosecution. Evidently, based on Cohen's fraudulent default judgment, LASD will seize any book advance I negotiate. I am, therefore, forced to advise you that I will direct any potential advance to be paid directly to Spetnatz, Iran's Revolutionary Guard, Mossad, President Kadyrov (Chechnya), and a particular monastery in Bhutan so that they can deal with LASD's seizure of their bank accounts. I feel this is, while unfortunate and extreme, the best way to handle the ongoing insanity and threats. I've asked Senate Judiciary, FBI and CIA to let me know if the proposed handling of my book publishing "advance," and a potential LASD raid, pose any problems from their point of view.

Let me know if you have any questions. By the way, I will be filing my RICO suit against Cohen in the very near future.

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:53 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

A writ of execution is issued ex parte by the court (without notice to the judgment debtor).

It is good for 180 days. You deliver it to the civil division of the sheriff where the property you want garnished, seized, attached or sold is located. You must also send to the sheriff ‎written instructions identifying the property to be attached, sold, seized, or garnished - such as "all bank accounts in the name of the judgment debtor located in the Bank of America branch located at 1356 Wilsire Blvd". The bank must then take the money out of the account, send it to the Sheriff, who in turn writes a check to the judgment plaintiff and sends it care of plaintiff's counsel.

In the case of property, say, a movie script, treatment, or manuscript, ‎the sheriff physically seizes the items and notices a "sheriff's sale" in a certain # of days specified by statute. If the public shows up to bid, cash is required. The judgnent creditor may bid at the sale using a "credit bid" of a small part of the judgment, raising the bid until he is the winner of the property at auction. The sheriff then issues a legally binding title to the item seized and sold and the judgment debtor receives a credit for the amount of the winning bid bid or credit bid.

The point is that Cohen will never have to "take you to court to fight about it" (as you have incorrectly stated). It's all routine. And easily done.

And there is nothing short of a bankruptcy filing that will stop it.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

Kelley Lynch's Emails to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers & Alan Hootnick Re: the Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:30 AM
Subject: Re:
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>
Cc: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>

Kory & Rice,

If you would like to discuss the Tax Court case, 9th Circuit appeal, or my RICO suit, please do so directly with any of those courts. In the meantime, this conduct should cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Alan Hootnick,

Would you like to explain why my Criminal Stalker continues to copy you on harassing emails where he argues and defends Leonard Cohen's legal positions? This particular email relates to the recent Tax Court order. While the criminal stalker, Stephen Gianelli, has not formally entered an appearance in any Cohen-related matter, he is most definitely an unofficial member of his legal team. I understand the "ticket to tax court" issue and will address that with the 9th Circuit. Gianelli has attempted to interfere with the Tax Court matter and that is the reason he contacted Mr. Fabian, IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office. I submitted evidence to Tax Court that the ongoing scheme involves a campaign of harassment and terrorism that has been directed not only at me but my sons, family members, friends, Paulette Brandt, and witnesses.

Gianelli has no idea what my "supplemental filing" was and this is nothing other than his attempt to obtain information. This criminal has not made anything clear to me other than his intent to obstruct justice, intimidate witnesses, and defend Leonard Cohen's legal positions while attempting to infiltrate the Spector case. He is now attempting to "dissuade" me from filing my RICO suit against Cohen, et al. Cohen stole from me. The evidence he has attempted to destroy, conceal, etc. proves that fact.

The criminal operative is out of his mind, dangerously unstable, and his copying you on these harassing communications is deeply disturbing.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:19 AM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

This order sets forth many of the reasons I emailed to you before the motion was decided as to why the tax court lacks jurisdiction over your petition, including much of the authority relied on by the court (including the case mentioning that a notice of determination is the taxpayer's "ticket to the tax court".

The order also reiterates a point I made to you early on - that since the court lacks jurisdiction over your petition, it has no ability (or desire) to consider your many ‎collateral allegations about all of the "harassment" you have "suffered". (Lawyers call this kind of collateral argument "bootstrapping" - and it is not permitted and (obviously) not successful.

This was underscored yet again when - on January 5, 2016 - the tax court struck your supplemental filing dated December 29, 2015, a filing that once again tried to inject collateral matters into the record - including your alleged "harassment".

Finally, it is made clear in the attached order of dismissal that your many filings completely ignored the only issue that was before the court: how does the tax court - a court of limited jurisdiction with no general equity powers - have jurisdiction over your petition in view of the fact that the IRS never transmitted to Kelley Lynch a notice of determination , let alone within 90 days of the filing of your 2015 petition.

That is one of your main failings in court. Kelley Lynch wants to talk about the issues that SHE deems important, and not the issues that the laws enacted by the legislature as viewed by judges and lawyers (who know a lot more than Kelley Lynch about the law) identify as the central issues to be addressed in the case.

Unless you can re-read the attached order, and not only understand it but see where your analysis went wrong, you have no hope of ever succeeding in a court of law.

Because the issues of jurisdiction on which the motion to dismiss your tax court petition turned were simple, basic, and straightforward.

In contrast, the thick underbrush of thorny issues, procedural issues that have grown around the entrance to federal district court since the termination of your business relationship with Leonard Cohen in September of 2004 (11+ years) are myriad, complex, and would be a daunting task for even a highly experienced and extremely talented trial attorney to navigate. Let alone someone like Kelley Lynch who cannot even grasp the concept of no notice of determination = no jurisdiction.

As I have demonstrated to you by citing the statutes and rules (and by transmitting to you recent, sample orders), because you will be asking the Central District for a fee waiver, a magistrate judge will review your complaint as soon as you request permission to file it without a fee for facial merit and rule compliance.

The first hurdle you will encounter is the requirement that your complaint consist of a plain and simple statement of your claims. This is because - based on your past filings - you have a compulsive desire to include a prolix factual narrative with every pleading you file. You simply must "tell your story" - the whole story - under the mistaken belief that anyone who hears all of the "facts" will see the case your way. So your complaint will be many hundreds of pages long and will reference scores of documents. You will literally include all of your evidentiary facts, and thereby violate federal pleading rules, including those prohibiting prolix filings.

Next, the allegations of conspiracy upon which your RICO suit is constructed will be short on the kind of critical detail (date, place of illegal agreement, persons present, words stated) will be lacking in PLAUSIBILITY and therefore subject to dismissal.

It will also be clear to the reviewing magistrate that many of your complaints arise from your dissatisfaction with prior criminal and civil proceedings adjudicated ‎in state court, and that your filing violates the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine as well as principles of res judicata. This includes your protestations of innocence notwithstanding your 2012 criminal conviction and your cliams that Lenoard Cohen owes you money (and/or "stole from you") notwistanding the May 25, 2006 judgment to the contrary (that YOU owe Cohen money, and he owes you nothing) and two unseccessful motions by you in 2013 and in 2015 to set that judgment aside.

It will also be readily apparent to the magistrate judge reviewing your fee waiver application that much of what you complain about consists of absolutely privileged litigation ‎conduct.

The court will also observe that your claims appear to be outside the applicable 4-year RICO statute of limitations.

For all of these reasons, the magistrate judge is going to DENY your fee waiver request, is going to DISMISS your complaint by checking that box on the Central District form order I previously emailed to you, and it will do so LONG BEFORE Leonard Cohen is required to file a responsive pleading.

Therefore, you will not even force Cohen to respond to your allegations.

The case will be over before Cohen even knows you sued him!

Think about that.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Kelley Lynch Email to Alan Hootnick Re. Leonard Cohen, CIA MK Ultra Program, Bay of Pigs, & The Criminal Stalker Operative

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Alan Hootnick,

My Criminal Stalker has been writing you slandering me and copying me in. I have all the emails so this is not debatable. Refuting slander to third parties is an indictment of my conduct? I think not.

Gianelli is representing Leonard Cohen's legal positions. He has not entered a formal notice of appearance in any Cohen matter. Kory & Rice have been advised to cease and desist as well.

My RICO suit against Cohen, et al. will be filed in the very near future. Cohen is certainly interested in my fee waivers. I suppose that's because this was designed when he willfully bankrupted me, withheld commissions due me, and stole from me via default judgment.

How do you like Cohen's fantasies about men holding guns on him. Do you think the Cuban authorities, after interrogating this fraud, gave him a necklace? Well, I don't believe Phil Spector ever said he loved him. Do you think he was a CIA MK Ultra participant? I have no idea why Cohen has credibility with anyone.

Please have your discussions directly with Gianelli and leave me out of them. Maybe he can use you to get to Bruce Cutler.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:15 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Ms. Lynch,

1. Your protestations that you are "uninterested" in what I have say would have greater credibility if you did not devote so many typewritten words daily in mass emails and on your blog addressing "Gianelli" and his observations.

2. Writing to Kory, Rice, Hootnick (or anyone else) to complain about my communications is - for reasons that I have previously explained - utterly pointless.

3. For all of the many reasons that have been previously explained to you chapter and verse with supporting pinpoint citations to governing authority, if and when you file a RICO suit a magistrate judge for the Central District will undertake an evaluation of the facial merits of your Complaint in connection with your fee waiver request. That review will result in a dismissal of your case well before any defendant (including Cohen) is required to respond to the suit.

Good luck!

On Monday, January 11, 2016, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli, Kory, and Rice,

Cease and desist. This ongoing criminal harassment, slander, gratuitous insults, etc. is outrageous. Leonard Cohen is the individual with the history of drug and alcohol abuse, psychiatric problems, theft, false accusations against his representatives, and fantasies about armed men holding guns on him. He also has a history of playing the role of "our most important spy" that includes fabricated narratives about his participation in CIA's MK Ultra program, recon during Bay of Pigs, etc. He now has three versions of his bullshit Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court.

I remain uninterested in what a psychotic criminal stalker feels about me but intend to address this coordinated campaign of harassment in my RICO suit. Gianellil's harassing emails, which he has confirmed are meant to dissuade me, will not deter me from seeking legal remedies. He also continues with his attempts to elicit information by lying about matters such as his inane statements that I just attempted to file a document with more emails from him. The next document that will be filed with the Criminal Stalker's emails will be with the federal court. As Tax Court referred to my supplemental filings in its order, the email harassment will also be before the 9th Circuit Court.

If anyone is interested n intelligence agencies, please contact them directly and leave me out of your insanity. If LAPD's TMU have a position on who they think I should have a "sexual relationship" with, they can explain it to a federal court.

If you would like to discuss your views that Dmitri Kovtun is a murderer, please address that directly with Mr. Kovtun. I remain uninterested in the views held by criminals, thieves, liars, and frauds.

This ongoing criminal conduct should cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

>
> Bay of Pigs – Leonard Cohen
>
> Leonard Cohen and the Bay of Pigs
>
> The story of a young Cohen in Cuba. Read this story in Somersault’s free pdf issue!
>
> By Evan Fleischer (Evan Fleischer lives in Boston, Massachusetts. When he isn’t editing Somersault Magazine, he is a writer-at-large.)
>
> On one side, 1,400 American paratroopers tried to invade Cuba in April of 1961. On another side, Cuba repelled the invasion. And on the third side — the underappreciated side — a 27 year old Canadian by the name of Leonard Cohen was certainly doing something, though the nailed down quality of what it actually was seems to be up in the air.
>
> In one telling, Cohen went to Cuba because he was “fighting on both sides.” In another, he went because of “a deep interest in violence. I was very interested in what it really meant for a man to to carry arms and to kill other men — and how attracted I was exactly to that process.” And in the the third, he went, he got drunk (on rum, Cuba libre, or mojitos, quien sabe; déjame en paz y me deja escribir), spent his time with late night movie operators and hookers, was woken up by an official from the Canadian embassy, taken to said embassy, and politely and firmly informed that his mother was worried about him.
>
> Of the latter — Cuban militants tried to bomb the airport, the press of which overplayed the danger of the reality, thereby attracting his mother’s attention — Cohen said that he felt feisty when he’d been woken by the embassy official, like Upton Sinclair. “I was on an important mission!”
>
> Cohen’s first album is four years off at this time. Let us cheat with the Oujia Board you and I both share and re-introduce the names of AM Klein, FR Scott, Irving Layton, and Lorca, Lorca, Federico Garcia Lorca (a marble-like polaris Cohen enjoyed to roll with others in his hand like worry beads, like prayer beads, like an oddly shaped coin he keeps in his pocket because it makes him smile) to the equation — and when he’s there, he’s in khaki shorts, lets his beard to stubble length, and returns to his old habits of staying up ‘til three in the morning.
>
> Oh the sisters of mercy, they are not departed or gone.
>
> Come the Havana evening, Leonard — in the words of one biographer — joined “the pimps, hookers, gamblers, small-time criminals, and black marketers … roamed the urban slums of Jesus del Monte to the swank waterfront suburbs of Miramar.
>
> There’s also this.
>
> Ira Nadel — the biographer quoted above — explains: “Wearing his khakis and carrying a hunting knife, he was suddenly surrounded by twelve soldiers with Czech submachine guns. It was late at night and they thought he was the first of an American landing team. They marched him to the local police station while he repeated the only Spanish he knew, a slogan of Castro’s: Amistad del pueblo, ‘Friendship of the People.’ This made no impression on his captors, but after an hour and a half of interrogation, Cohen convinced them he was not a spy buy a fan of the regime who wanted to be there.”
>
> Yes you who must leave everything that you cannot control.
>
> He convinced them he was an innocent man. They brought out rum and bequeathed him a necklace of shells and bullets. The next morning, he was driven back to Havana. It’s there this picture was taken. It’s there he runs into American communists. It’s there he’s called a bourgeois individualist.
>
> Anti-aircraft fire fills the night. A platoon runs down the street and crouches behind the statue of an iron lion. “Hopelessly Hollywood,” Cohen later wrote.
>
> The next morning he shaved and put on a seersucker suit and wrote a letter to Jack McClelland, a Canadian publisher. “Just think how well the book would sell if I’m hit in an air-raid. What great publicity! Don’t tell me you haven’t been considering it.”
>
> Cohen was temporarily detained, and — given that — tried to leave the country. When he did, he discovered a red line drawn through his name on a clipboard at the airport and was directed to a security room, at which point the picture of him with the militants was discovered. They put him under a guard, a fourteen year old with a rifle, a fourteen year old with whom he then tried to have an argument, which went nowhere. A scuffle broke out somewhere in the airport. The teenage guard ran off to assist. Cohen was left alone.
>
> Cohen looked around, repacked his bag, got back in line, and boarded. No one asked for his ticket.
>
> A poem to mark the occasion comes quickly, blithely and fearsomely announcing in “the only tourist in Havana turns his thoughts homewards” —
>
> http://somersaultmag.tumblr.com/post/37832329181/leonard-cohen-and-the-bay-of-pigs
>
>

Monday, January 11, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers, His Operative & Her Stalker

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:53 PM
Subject:
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>

Gianelli, Kory, and Rice,

This ongoing criminal conduct should cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

Bay of Pigs – Leonard Cohen

Leonard Cohen and the Bay of Pigs

The story of a young Cohen in Cuba. Read this story in Somersault’s free pdf issue!

By Evan Fleischer (Evan Fleischer lives in Boston, Massachusetts. When he isn’t editing Somersault Magazine, he is a writer-at-large.)

On one side, 1,400 American paratroopers tried to invade Cuba in April of 1961. On another side, Cuba repelled the invasion. And on the third side — the underappreciated side — a 27 year old Canadian by the name of Leonard Cohen was certainly doing something, though the nailed down quality of what it actually was seems to be up in the air.

In one telling, Cohen went to Cuba because he was “fighting on both sides.” In another, he went because of “a deep interest in violence. I was very interested in what it really meant for a man to to carry arms and to kill other men — and how attracted I was exactly to that process.” And in the the third, he went, he got drunk (on rum, Cuba libre, or mojitos, quien sabe; déjame en paz y me deja escribir), spent his time with late night movie operators and hookers, was woken up by an official from the Canadian embassy, taken to said embassy, and politely and firmly informed that his mother was worried about him.

Of the latter — Cuban militants tried to bomb the airport, the press of which overplayed the danger of the reality, thereby attracting his mother’s attention — Cohen said that he felt feisty when he’d been woken by the embassy official, like Upton Sinclair. “I was on an important mission!”

Cohen’s first album is four years off at this time. Let us cheat with the Oujia Board you and I both share and re-introduce the names of AM Klein, FR Scott, Irving Layton, and Lorca, Lorca, Federico Garcia Lorca (a marble-like polaris Cohen enjoyed to roll with others in his hand like worry beads, like prayer beads, like an oddly shaped coin he keeps in his pocket because it makes him smile) to the equation — and when he’s there, he’s in khaki shorts, lets his beard to stubble length, and returns to his old habits of staying up ‘til three in the morning.

Oh the sisters of mercy, they are not departed or gone.

Come the Havana evening, Leonard — in the words of one biographer — joined “the pimps, hookers, gamblers, small-time criminals, and black marketers … roamed the urban slums of Jesus del Monte to the swank waterfront suburbs of Miramar.

There’s also this.

Ira Nadel — the biographer quoted above — explains: “Wearing his khakis and carrying a hunting knife, he was suddenly surrounded by twelve soldiers with Czech submachine guns. It was late at night and they thought he was the first of an American landing team. They marched him to the local police station while he repeated the only Spanish he knew, a slogan of Castro’s: Amistad del pueblo, ‘Friendship of the People.’ This made no impression on his captors, but after an hour and a half of interrogation, Cohen convinced them he was not a spy buy a fan of the regime who wanted to be there.”

Yes you who must leave everything that you cannot control.

He convinced them he was an innocent man. They brought out rum and bequeathed him a necklace of shells and bullets. The next morning, he was driven back to Havana. It’s there this picture was taken. It’s there he runs into American communists. It’s there he’s called a bourgeois individualist.

Anti-aircraft fire fills the night. A platoon runs down the street and crouches behind the statue of an iron lion. “Hopelessly Hollywood,” Cohen later wrote.

The next morning he shaved and put on a seersucker suit and wrote a letter to Jack McClelland, a Canadian publisher. “Just think how well the book would sell if I’m hit in an air-raid. What great publicity! Don’t tell me you haven’t been considering it.”

Cohen was temporarily detained, and — given that — tried to leave the country. When he did, he discovered a red line drawn through his name on a clipboard at the airport and was directed to a security room, at which point the picture of him with the militants was discovered. They put him under a guard, a fourteen year old with a rifle, a fourteen year old with whom he then tried to have an argument, which went nowhere. A scuffle broke out somewhere in the airport. The teenage guard ran off to assist. Cohen was left alone.

Cohen looked around, repacked his bag, got back in line, and boarded. No one asked for his ticket.

A poem to mark the occasion comes quickly, blithely and fearsomely announcing in “the only tourist in Havana turns his thoughts homewards” —

http://somersaultmag.tumblr.com/post/37832329181/leonard-cohen-and-the-bay-of-pigs

From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Email to FSB dated January 11, 2015
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Kelley Lynch's Criminal Stalker Has Informed Her That She Will Learn A "Painful Lesson" Over Her Interest In Former KGB Agent, Dmitri Kovtun; Meanwhile The Stalker Continues to Represent the Legal Interests of "Our Most Important Spy," Leonard Cohen

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM
Subject: Fwd: Email to FSB dated January 11, 2015
To: fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Cc: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

FSB and CIA,

I'm not permitted to date a former KGB agent if he's single. My criminal stalker has weighed in now. I'm going to learn a "painful lesson" over Dmitri Kovton evidently.

Kelley

Who does LAPD's TMU think Lynch should have "sexual relationships" with? Just "our most important spy" who fantasizes about men holding guns on him. Would the misogynists like to weigh in? Since LAPD's TMU assigns Kelley Lynch "dating relationships," they should feel free to weigh in. Perhaps the issue could be put to a vote.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM
Subject: Email to FSB dated January 11, 2015
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

It is unsurprising I but still disappointing - to see that you have such little self-insight and awareness.

But it is what it is.

"Very shortly" has a different meaning to you, apparently, but this too is unsurprising in view of your 8- year delay in moving to set aside the entry of default in BC338322.

Nor - apparently - have you learned anything from the many statutory and case authorities I have transmitted to you on the folly of filing a RICO suit at this point. This is also unsurprising.

Some people never learn.

As for your very public courting of foreign intelligence services - some of whom are adverse to US interests - you are in for a painful lesson in that regard as well. Perhaps "lesson" is not quite right, since I have no doubt that whatever additional hardships you encounter as a result of this foolish behavior, you will learn nothing from the experience.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

Kelley Lynch's Email to FSB Re. Dmitri Kovtun, Andrei Lugovoy, Litvenenko Case, & Her Criminal Stalker's Revenge Fantasies

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:16 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Hello FSB,

My Criminal Stalker has some thoughts on Dmitri Kovtun. His revenge fantasy involves a "KGB killer." I suppose the fabricated, moronic narrative the British government has come up with works for people with relatively little intelligence. As my friend said last night: "Dmitri Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoy were obviously walking around Europe with a bag of polonium-210 that had a hole in it." And, as Phil Spector has said about hits: "Is it dumb enough?

My Stalker however wants to talk about Bruce Cutler and Dennis Riordan. The reason for this is because he is aligned with Spector's prosecutors and argues their deranged theories online. Clarkson's DNA was on the ammunition and the gun was not Phil Spector's.

Deep down I realize that in the very near future I will be filing a RICO suit against Leonard Cohen.

Who is the "violent" individual in this case? Leonard Cohen. He is a man who once told me that he locked himself in his house due to his violent and homicidal thoughts. When "our most important spy," Leonard Cohen, was acting as CIA Recon during Bay of Pigs, he had a deep interest in "violence." Cohen also has fantasies about men holding guns on him. In this particular version (see link) 12 armed men marched Cohen to the local police station. With Phil Spector, depending on what version of his bullshit story one believes, Phillip held an automatic or semi-automatic (possibly a cross bow) to Cohen's head, neck, or chest.

I do not believe for a moment that Messrs. Kovtun or Lugovoy committed "state sanctioned murder." I don't have a "romantic obsession" with a "KGB killer" but I do have a psychotic stalker who may have found a sympathetic ear about me with Phil Spector's deranged prosecutor Alan Jackson.

http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2014/09/cia-inquiry-leonard-cohens-roles-in-bay.html

I have never issued a death threat. I sent a Valentine's Day card to FBI and DOJ. I also sent certain individuals a parody email when former DA Steve Cooley was running around threatening to "execute" people using a drug they put dogs down with. ACLU went after him over that issue as well. I suppose Cooley was particularly threatened that, if I became President, I would instruct my Attorney General to prosecute him.

I am, of course, dealing with incredibly sick, twisted, and deviant individuals with serious revenge fantasies. My Stalker's revenge fantasies also include his alleged "Mafia" connections.

Kelley

THE FACTS BEHIND THE LITVENENKO CASE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8BRZwZAuPA

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:59 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

Whether you have the insight to realize it or not, your romantic fantasy about a KGB killer is quite reveling.

Before, you fantasized about strong and powerful lawyers riding to your rescue (Riordan, Cutler) - even to the point of writing about "marriage" with Spector attorney Bruce Cutler.

But deep down you now realize that initiating further legal proceedings are ‎futile - even if your conscious mind has not yet accepted it.

Instead, you now realize (subconsciously at least) ‎that any recompense or pay-back will have to be extra-judcial in nature. That the legal system will not come to your rescue.

So you now fantasize about powerful, violent men who have (reputedly) committed state sanctioned murder. That is now the focus of your erotomania.

You are well to realize that the legal system has no future for you. Any federal court RICO suit would be quickly dismissed by the district court during the course of its review of your fee waiver application (which review includes looking at the merits of the complaint ‎in federal court). A federal RICO suit would only result in a dismissal and more "I told you so's" from me, and another humuliating defeat. You know that now, and that's progress of sorts. At least part of you knows that now.

But your romantic obsession with ‎a KGB killer is disturbing.

Violence, which is the only avenue other than more fruitless court filings or letting it go and moving on (the logical thing to do) will only get you years behind bars.

You already have a criminal record involving death threats. (you may not view them as death threats, but judge's do which is all that matters.)

Don't expect probation or a misdemeanor prosecution if you cross that line.